These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
121 related items for PubMed ID: 35972588
21. The correlation between glaucomatous visual field loss and vision-related quality of life. Orta AÖ, Öztürker ZK, Erkul SÖ, Bayraktar Ş, Yilmaz OF. J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(5):e121-7. PubMed ID: 25642814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion using the head-mounted perimeter imo. Wakayama A, Matsumoto C, Ayato Y, Shimomura Y. PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210691. PubMed ID: 30653560 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. Bengtsson B. Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the Performance of a Novel, Smartphone-based, Head-mounted Perimeter (GearVision) With the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Pradhan ZS, Sircar T, Agrawal H, Rao HL, Bopardikar A, Devi S, Tiwari VN. J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr 01; 30(4):e146-e152. PubMed ID: 33596021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma. Rao HL, Raveendran S, James V, Dasari S, Palakurthy M, Reddy HB, Pradhan ZS, Rao DA, Puttaiah NK, Devi S. J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar 01; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Humphrey MATRIX and Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard strategy in detecting early glaucomatous visual field loss. Prema R, George R, Hemamalini A, Sathyamangalam Ve R, Baskaran M, Vijaya L. Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar 01; 57(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 19384015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Utility of CLOCK CHART binocular edition for self-checking the binocular visual field in patients with glaucoma. Ishibashi M, Matsumoto C, Hashimoto S, Eura M, Okuyama S, Nomoto H, Tanabe F, Kayazawa T, Numata T, Kusaka S. Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov 01; 103(11):1672-1676. PubMed ID: 30636206 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Development and validation of an improved neurological hemifield test to identify chiasmal and postchiasmal lesions by automated perimetry. McCoy AN, Quigley HA, Wang J, Miller NR, Subramanian PS, Ramulu PY, Boland MV. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Feb 20; 55(2):1017-23. PubMed ID: 24448263 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of Matrix with Humphrey Field Analyzer II with SITA. Fredette MJ, Giguère A, Anderson DR, Budenz DL, McSoley J. Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May 20; 92(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 25875683 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative Analysis of 10-2 Test on Advanced Vision Analyzer and Humphrey Perimeter in Glaucoma. Narang P, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Narang R, Sundaramoorthy L. Ophthalmol Sci; 2023 Jun 20; 3(2):100264. PubMed ID: 36846107 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of an algorithm for detecting visual field defects due to chiasmal and postchiasmal lesions: the neurological hemifield test. Boland MV, McCoy AN, Quigley HA, Miller NR, Subramanian PS, Ramulu PY, Murakami P, Danesh-Meyer HV. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Oct 10; 52(11):7959-65. PubMed ID: 21896843 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The TsiogkaSpaeth grid for detection of neurological visual field defects: a validation study. Tsiogka A, Moster ML, Chatzistefanou KI, Karmiris E, Samoli E, Giachos I, Droutsas K, Papaconstantinou D, Spaeth GL. Neurol Sci; 2024 Jun 10; 45(6):2869-2875. PubMed ID: 38191765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices. Asaoka R, Crabb DP, Yamashita T, Russell RA, Wang YX, Garway-Heath DF. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep 01; 52(9):7007-11. PubMed ID: 21810985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Threshold perimetry of each eye with both eyes open in patients with monocular functional (nonorganic) and organic vision loss. Martin TJ. Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun 01; 125(6):857-64. PubMed ID: 9645724 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking. Murray IC, Fleck BW, Brash HM, Macrae ME, Tan LL, Minns RA. Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct 01; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Loss of stereopsis with optic chiasmal lesions and stereoscopic tests as a differential test. Hirai T, Ito Y, Arai M, Ota Y, Kojima T, Sato M, Miyake Y. Ophthalmology; 2002 Sep 01; 109(9):1692-702. PubMed ID: 12208719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Binocular Visual Field and Vision-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Hemianopia. Burgos-Blasco B, Perez-Garcia P, Fernandez-Vigo JI, Benito-Pascual B, Hernandez-Garcia E, Saenz-Frances F, Santos-Bueso E. J Neuroophthalmol; 2022 Mar 01; 42(1):e217-e224. PubMed ID: 34001737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects. Noval S, Contreras I, Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Ruiz de Zárate B. Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar 01; 15(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16329059 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the TEMPO Binocular Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer. Nishida T, Weinreb R, Arias J, Vasile C, Moghimi S. Res Sq; 2023 Aug 29. PubMed ID: 37693597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficiency of Rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of homonymous hemianopia in stroke patients. Gedik S, Akman A, Akova YA. Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Aug 29; 91(8):1065-9. PubMed ID: 17301122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]