These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 35987801

  • 21. Transitional joint effusion in the mandibular prognathic surgery patient: intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Nishimura M, Segami N, Sato J, Honjou M, Fujimura K.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 May; 62(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 15122556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Horizontal changes in the condylar head after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with bent plate fixation.
    Ueki K, Degerliyurt K, Hashiba Y, Marukawa K, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):656-61. PubMed ID: 18602292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Stability of pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery depending on mandibular surgical techniques: SSRO vs IVRO.
    Choi SH, Yoo HJ, Lee JY, Jung YS, Choi JW, Lee KJ.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 27524382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Swallowing Functions after Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy with Loose Fixation for Mandibular Prognathism: A Retrospective Case Series Research.
    Miura KI, Yoshida M, Rokutanda S, Koga T, Umeda M.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan 20; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Effects of sagittal split Ramus osteotomy on condylar position and Ramal orientation in patients with mandibular asymmetry.
    Meral SE, Koç O, Tosun E, Tüz HH.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec 30; 28(1):65. PubMed ID: 38158456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Effects of mandibular setback on the temporomandibular joint: a comparison of oblique and sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Hu J, Wang D, Zou S.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr 30; 58(4):375-80; discussion 380-1. PubMed ID: 10759116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Retrospective study of changes in the sensitivity of the oral mucosa: sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO).
    Hasegawa T, Tateishi C, Asai M, Imai Y, Okamoto N, Shioyasono A, Kimoto A, Akashi M, Suzuki H, Furudoi S, Komori T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar 30; 44(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 25468631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Comparison of osseous healing after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Rokutanda S, Yamada S, Yanamoto S, Omori K, Fujimura Y, Morita Y, Rokutanda H, Kohara H, Fujishita A, Nakamura T, Yoshimi T, Yoshida N, Umeda M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct 30; 47(10):1316-1321. PubMed ID: 29843949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback.
    Yoshioka I, Khanal A, Tominaga K, Horie A, Furuta N, Fukuda J.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun 30; 66(6):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18486778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Effect of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on morphologic parameters of temporomandibular joint in patients with mandibular prognathism.
    Ma HD, Shu JH, Deng XZ, Liu Z.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May 30; 98(22):e15830. PubMed ID: 31145325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A new osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: techniques and rationale of the intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy.
    Choung PH.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1992 May 30; 20(4):153-62. PubMed ID: 1629365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Condylar surface CT value in sagittal plane before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ueki K, Yoshizawa K, Moroi A, Iguchi R, Kosaka A, Ikawa H, Hotta A, Tsutsui T, Saito Y, Fukaya K, Hiraide R, Takayama A, Tsunoda T.
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun 30; 21(2):159-169. PubMed ID: 28247093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
    Kim YJ, Oh KM, Hong JS, Lee JH, Kim HM, Reyes M, Cevidanes LH, Park YH.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep 30; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Biomechanical effect of asymmetric mandibular prognathism treated with BSSRO and USSRO on temporomandibular joints: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Li H, Zhou N, Huang X, Zhang T, He S, Guo P.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov 30; 58(9):1103-1109. PubMed ID: 32646786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation on the condylar displacement following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric setback patients: Comparison between conventional approach and surgery-first approach.
    Oh MH, Hwang HS, Lee KM, Cho JH.
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep 30; 87(5):733-738. PubMed ID: 28530843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Skeletal Stability after Mandibular Setback via Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Verse Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.
    Chen CM, Hwang DS, Hsiao SY, Chen HS, Hsu KJ.
    J Clin Med; 2021 Oct 26; 10(21):. PubMed ID: 34768470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Dislocation of temporomandibular joint: complication of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Mitsukawa N, Morishita T, Saiga A, Kubota Y, Omori N, Akita S, Satoh K.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Sep 26; 24(5):1674-5. PubMed ID: 24163864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Movement of the proximal segment after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus short lingual osteotomy with physiological positioning strategy.
    Ohba S, Tominaga J, Koga T, Miura KI, Yoshida N, Asahina I.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul 26; 48(7):638-644. PubMed ID: 32439368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Condylar head remodeling following mandibular setback osteotomy for prognathism: a comparative study of different imaging modalities.
    Katsumata A, Nojiri M, Fujishita M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais RP.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr 26; 101(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 16545716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Evaluation of condylar surface CT values related to condylar height reduction after orthognathic surgery.
    Ueki K, Yoshizawa K, Saito Y, Takayama A, Baba N, Kimura Y, Koizumi M, Fujimoto K, Iguchi R, Sato M, Osada AH, Moroi A.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug 26; 49(8):639-648. PubMed ID: 33994298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.