These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


197 related items for PubMed ID: 3600604

  • 21. In vitro receptor binding assays: general methods and considerations.
    Bigott-Hennkens HM, Dannoon S, Lewis MR, Jurisson SS.
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Sep; 52(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 18475249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Radioligand exchange binding cannot directly determine the dissociation constant (Kd) of the rat ventral prostate nuclear androgen receptor: valid Kd determinations require additional uptake binding data.
    Chapman JC, Freeh SM, Michael SD.
    Arch Biochem Biophys; 1993 Dec; 307(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 8274009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Prediction of ligand binding affinity and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dynamics simulations and the linear interaction energy method.
    van Lipzig MM, ter Laak AM, Jongejan A, Vermeulen NP, Wamelink M, Geerke D, Meerman JH.
    J Med Chem; 2004 Feb 12; 47(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 14761204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Ligand competition binding assay for the androgen receptor.
    Féau C, Arnold LA, Kosinski A, Guy RK.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011 Feb 12; 776():59-68. PubMed ID: 21796520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Practical aspects of radioligand binding.
    McKinney M, Raddatz R.
    Curr Protoc Pharmacol; 2006 Jul 12; Chapter 1():Unit1.3. PubMed ID: 22294165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Estimation of the dissociation rate of unlabelled ligand-receptor complexes by a 'two-step' competition binding approach.
    Packeu A, Wennerberg M, Balendran A, Vauquelin G.
    Br J Pharmacol; 2010 Nov 12; 161(6):1311-28. PubMed ID: 20946109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Intermolecular ligand substitution reactions.
    Jenkins WT.
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984 Nov 12; 144B():89-96. PubMed ID: 6718418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Radioligand-binding methods for membrane preparations and intact cells.
    Bylund DB, Deupree JD, Toews ML.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2004 Nov 12; 259():1-28. PubMed ID: 15250483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Dual-point competition association assay: a fast and high-throughput kinetic screening method for assessing ligand-receptor binding kinetics.
    Guo D, van Dorp EJ, Mulder-Krieger T, van Veldhoven JP, Brussee J, Ijzerman AP, Heitman LH.
    J Biomol Screen; 2013 Mar 12; 18(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 23093571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Agonist binding to the Torpedo acetylcholine receptor. 1. Complexities revealed by dissociation kinetics.
    Dunn SM, Raftery MA.
    Biochemistry; 1997 Apr 01; 36(13):3846-53. PubMed ID: 9092814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Nonequilibrium analysis alters the mechanistic interpretation of inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by peripheral site ligands.
    Szegletes T, Mallender WD, Rosenberry TL.
    Biochemistry; 1998 Mar 24; 37(12):4206-16. PubMed ID: 9521743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Neuroglobin ligand binding kinetics.
    Kiger L, Uzan J, Dewilde S, Burmester T, Hankeln T, Moens L, Hamdane D, Baudin-Creuza V, Marden M.
    IUBMB Life; 2004 Mar 24; 56(11-12):709-19. PubMed ID: 15804836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Theoretical analysis of the inter-ligand overhauser effect: a new approach for mapping structural relationships of macromolecular ligands.
    London RE.
    J Magn Reson; 1999 Dec 24; 141(2):301-11. PubMed ID: 10579953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The impact of orthosteric radioligand depletion on the quantification of allosteric modulator interactions.
    Avlani VA, McLoughlin DJ, Sexton PM, Christopoulos A.
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 2008 Jun 24; 325(3):927-34. PubMed ID: 18322151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Self-consistent theory of reversible ligand binding to a spherical cell.
    Ghosh S, Gopalakrishnan M, Forsten-Williams K.
    Phys Biol; 2008 Jan 08; 4(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 18185012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.