These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

147 related items for PubMed ID: 36088303

  • 1. Comparing suction rates of novel DuCanto catheter against Yankauer and standard suction catheter using liquids of different viscosity-a technical simulation.
    Finke SR, Schroeder DC, Ecker H, Böttiger BW, Herff H, Wetsch WA.
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 Sep 10; 22(1):285. PubMed ID: 36088303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro comparison of neonatal suction catheters using simulated 'pea soup' meconium.
    Zareen Z, Hawkes CP, Krickan ER, Dempsey EM, Ryan CA.
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2013 May 10; 98(3):F241-3. PubMed ID: 23580703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of the Feasibility and Safety of Nasotracheal Suctioning With Curved Edge Catheter Versus Conventional Suction Catheter in Critically Ill Subjects: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Grigoriadis KΕ, Angouras DC, Flevari A, Xathos T.
    Respir Care; 2015 Dec 10; 60(12):1826-33. PubMed ID: 26487746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Physiological responses to endotracheal and oral suctioning in paediatric patients: the influence of endotracheal tube sizes and suction pressures.
    Singh NC, Kissoon N, Frewen T, Tiffin N.
    Clin Intensive Care; 1991 Dec 10; 2(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 10149098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Endotracheal suctioning: from principles to practice.
    Morrow BM, Futter MJ, Argent AC.
    Intensive Care Med; 2004 Jun 10; 30(6):1167-74. PubMed ID: 15034648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. An in vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of endotracheal suction catheters.
    Shah S, Fung K, Brim S, Rubin BK.
    Chest; 2005 Nov 10; 128(5):3699-704. PubMed ID: 16304336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Suction catheter size: an assessment and comparison of 3 different calculation methods.
    Russian CJ, Gonzales JF, Henry NR.
    Respir Care; 2014 Jan 10; 59(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23777657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of applying positive pressure with or without endotracheal suctioning during extubation: a laboratory study.
    Andreu MF, Salvati IG, Donnianni MC, Ibañez B, Cotignola M, Bezzi M.
    Respir Care; 2014 Dec 10; 59(12):1905-11. PubMed ID: 25425709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.