These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

478 related items for PubMed ID: 36157546

  • 1. Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Rotermund C, Djinbachian R, Taghiakbari M, Enderle MD, Eickhoff A, von Renteln D.
    World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Aug 07; 28(29):4007-4018. PubMed ID: 36157546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Rates of Incomplete Resection of 1- to 20-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Djinbachian R, Iratni R, Durand M, Marques P, von Renteln D.
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Sep 07; 159(3):904-914.e12. PubMed ID: 32437747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Local recurrence rates after resection of large colorectal serrated lesions with or without margin thermal ablation.
    Djinbachian R, Amar L, Pohl H, Safih W, Bouchard S, Deslandres E, Dorais J, von Renteln D.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2024 Sep 07; 59(1):112-117. PubMed ID: 37743643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
    Oh CK, Cho YW, Jung J, Lee HY, Kim JB, Cho YS.
    Sci Rep; 2024 Sep 02; 14(1):20335. PubMed ID: 39223224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Kim MJ, Na SY, Kim JS, Choi HH, Kim DB, Ji JS, Kim BW, Choi H.
    Surg Endosc; 2023 May 02; 37(5):3789-3795. PubMed ID: 36690892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effectiveness and safety of the different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Yuan X, Gao H, Liu C, Cui H, Zhang Z, Xie J, Lu H, Xu L.
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2021 May 02; 27(6):331-341. PubMed ID: 34643573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Resection depth and layer of cold snare polypectomy versus endoscopic mucosal resection.
    Ito A, Suga T, Ota H, Tateiwa N, Matsumoto A, Tanaka E.
    J Gastroenterol; 2018 Nov 02; 53(11):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 29516270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial.
    Kemper G, Gerges C, Schoon EJ, Schreuder RM, Schrauwen RRW, Epping LSM, Beyna T, Drenth JPH, Gündug U, Siersema PD, van Geenen EJM, ENDOCARE study group.
    Trials; 2024 Feb 17; 25(1):132. PubMed ID: 38368409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of cold snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection for 3-10-mm colorectal polyps in end-stage renal disease patients.
    Oh CK, Choi HS, Cho YS.
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2022 Feb 17; 28(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 34755710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.