These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
135 related items for PubMed ID: 36213845
1. Evaluation of Sagittal Inclination of Occlusal Plane and Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Various Anterior Reference Points on Arcon and Nonarcon Articulators. Palaskar JN, Joshi NP, Hindocha AD, Gunjal AP, Balsaraf KD. Contemp Clin Dent; 2022; 13(3):255-260. PubMed ID: 36213845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators. Palaskar JN, Joshi N, Gullapalli P, Shah P. J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 31227235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of a novel rotation coordinating device on registered horizontal condylar guidance of nonarcon semi-adjustable articulators. Manshaee F, Najatidanesh F, Savabi O, Atash R. Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023 Feb; 20():101. PubMed ID: 38020259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinical study of the variation in horizontal condylar guidance obtained by using three anterior points of reference and two different articulator systems. Prajapati P, Sethuraman R, Naveen YG, Patel J. Contemp Clin Dent; 2013 Apr; 4(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 24015003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study. Goyal MK, Goyal S. Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Apr; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant. Nazir N, Sujesh M, Kumar R, Sreenivas P. Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients. Kumar CD, Selvaraj S, Mohan J, Raju R. Ann Afr Med; 2023 Apr; 22(3):316-320. PubMed ID: 37417019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Geometric analysis of occlusal plane orientation using simulated ear-rod facebow transfer. dos Santos Júnior J, Nelson SJ, Nummikoski P. J Prosthodont; 1996 Sep; 5(3):172-81. PubMed ID: 9028221 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinico-radiographic study to compare and co-relate sagittal condylar guidance determined by intraoral gothic arch tracing method and panoramic radiograph in completely edentulous patients. Shetty S, Kunta M, Shenoy K. J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018 Sep; 18(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 29430137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of condylar settings of three semiadjustable articulators. Gross M, Nemcovsky C, Friedlander LD. Int J Prosthodont; 1990 Sep; 3(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 2133380 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The importance of the Hanau formula in construction of complete dentures. Javid NS, Porter MR. J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Oct; 34(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 1100807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]