These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 36223863

  • 1. Assessing the Impact of Vaginal Hysterectomy with Vaginal Mesh Attachment on Outcomes and Complications during Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Woodburn KL, Bradley SE, Ward SA, Schirm KA, Clarke B, Gutman RE, Sokol AI.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 36223863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Route of Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Gupta A, Ton JB, Maheshwari D, Schroeder MN, Small AN, Jia X, Demtchouk VO, Hoke TP, Murphy M.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Feb 01; 28(2):85-89. PubMed ID: 34333501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Risk of postoperative mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy with supracervical versus total concomitant laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Glass Clark S, Bretschneider CE, Bradley MS, Rhodes S, Shoag J, Sheyn D.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jan 01; 35(1):207-213. PubMed ID: 38060029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prolapse and mesh reoperations following sacrocolpopexy: comparing supracervical hysterectomy, total hysterectomy, and no hysterectomy.
    Kikuchi JY, Yanek LR, Handa VL, Chen CCG, Jacobs S, Blomquist J, Patterson D.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan 01; 34(1):135-145. PubMed ID: 35689689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Transvaginal Versus Transabdominal Placement of Synthetic Mesh at Time of Sacrocolpopexy.
    Nosti PA, Carter CM, Sokol AI, Tefera E, Iglesia CB, Park AJ, Gutman RE.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016 Jan 01; 22(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 26571429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
    Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, Nager CW, Lukacz ES.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2011 Feb 01; 22(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 20842494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Mesh complications after total vs supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy at time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Das D, Carroll A, Mueller M, Kenton K, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Collins S, Geynisman-Tan J, Bretschneider CE.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Sep 01; 33(9):2507-2514. PubMed ID: 35666287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Laparoscopic excision and re-attachment of sacrocolpopexy mesh.
    Malekzadeh M, Ramirez-Caban L, Hurtado E.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Dec 01; 32(12):3301-3303. PubMed ID: 34003310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Supracervical Hysterectomy Is Protective against Mesh Complications after Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Population-Based Cohort Study of 12,189 Patients.
    Dallas K, Taich L, Kuhlmann P, Rogo-Gupta L, Eilber K, Anger JT, Scott V.
    J Urol; 2022 Mar 01; 207(3):669-676. PubMed ID: 34694142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF, Myers EM, Geller EJ.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014 Mar 01; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Apical Suspension Repair for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Menefee SA, Richter HE, Myers D, Moalli P, Weidner AC, Harvie HS, Rahn DD, Meriwether KV, Paraiso MFR, Whitworth R, Mazloomdoost D, Thomas S, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    JAMA Surg; 2024 Aug 01; 159(8):845-855. PubMed ID: 38776067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. What to Do With Recurrent Prolapse After Vaginal Mesh Failure?
    Norinho de Oliveira P, Bourdel N, Rabischong B, Canis M, Botchorishvili R.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb 01; 23(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 26408228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy or uterine preservation.
    Sato H, Otsuka S, Abe H, Tsukada S.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Sep 01; 34(9):2217-2224. PubMed ID: 37052646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Baines G, Price N, Jefferis H, Cartwright R, Jackson SR.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep 01; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
    Kisby CK, Occhino JA, Bews KA, Habermann EB, Linder BJ.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb 01; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
    Ow LL, Lim YN, Lee J, Murray C, Thomas E, Leitch A, Rosamilia A, Dwyer PL.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov 01; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Chapman GC, Slopnick EA, Roberts K, Sheyn D, Wherley S, Mahajan ST, Pollard RR.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb 01; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Transvaginal Excision of an Eroded Sacrocolpopexy Mesh by Using Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery Equipment.
    Mohr S, Siegenthaler F, Imboden S, Kuhn A, Mueller MD.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb 01; 24(7):1079-1080. PubMed ID: 28400220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.