These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

245 related items for PubMed ID: 3623862

  • 1. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
    Chan HP, Vyborny CJ, MacMahon H, Metz CE, Doi K, Sickles EA.
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography.
    Higashida Y, Moribe N, Morita K, Katsuda N, Hatemura M, Takada T, Takahashi M, Yamashita J.
    Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):483-6. PubMed ID: 1561354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
    Pisano ED, Cole EB, Major S, Zong S, Hemminger BM, Muller KE, Johnston RE, Walsh R, Conant E, Fajardo LL, Feig SA, Nishikawa RM, Yaffe MJ, Williams MB, Aylward SR.
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study.
    Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Grabbe E.
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):478-82. PubMed ID: 12857708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
    Gaspard-Bakhach S, Dilhuydy MH, Bonichon F, Barreau B, Henriques C, Maugey-Laulom B.
    J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
    Gavrielides MA, Lo JY, Vargas-Voracek R, Floyd CE.
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 10659733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets.
    Wang TC, Karayiannis NB.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Aug; 17(4):498-509. PubMed ID: 9845306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
    Diekmann S, Bick U, von Heyden H, Diekmann F.
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Full-field digital mammography: a phantom study for detection of microcalcification].
    Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Schorn C, Funke M, Fischer U, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 2000 Jul; 172(7):646-50. PubMed ID: 10962993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.