These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 36264869

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Retention force and stress distribution analysis of the cementless double crown-type implant-supported prosthesis.
    Hong SJ, Lee H, Lee YY, Kwon KR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):626-633. PubMed ID: 33386135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Incidence of undetected cement on CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia crowns and customized CAD/CAM implant abutments. A prospective case series.
    Wasiluk G, Chomik E, Gehrke P, Pietruska M, Skurska A, Pietruski J.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):774-778. PubMed ID: 27188407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Long-term retention of zirconia crowns cemented with current automixed cements.
    Lepe X, Streiff KR, Johnson GH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):788-794. PubMed ID: 32669207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Effect of Cement Type and Cementation Technique on the Retention of Implant-Supported Restorations.
    Zeinabadi Z, Nami M, Naserkhaki M, Tavakolizadeh S.
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2020 May; 30(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 33389917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
    Mehl C, Harder S, Steiner M, Vollrath O, Kern M.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P, Gultekin BA, Aydin M, Yalcin S.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. In Vitro Examination of the Use of Er:YAG Laser to Retrieve Lithium Disilicate Crowns from Titanium Implant Abutments.
    Grzech-Leśniak K, Bencharit S, Dalal N, Mroczka K, Deeb JG.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):672-676. PubMed ID: 31125150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The effect of retentive groove, sandblasting and cement type on the retentive strength of stainless steel crowns in primary second molars--an in vitro comparative study.
    Veerabadhran MM, Reddy V, Nayak UA, Rao AP, Sundaram MA.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012 Jul; 30(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 22565513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.