These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

150 related items for PubMed ID: 36269370

  • 1. Assessment of aortic diameter in Marfan patients: intraindividual comparison of 3D-Dixon and 2D-SSFP magnetic resonance imaging.
    Wright F, Warncke M, Sinn M, Ristow I, Lenz A, Riedel C, Schoennagel BP, Zhang S, Kaul MG, Adam G, von Kodolitsch Y, Sehner S, Bannas P.
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Mar; 33(3):1687-1697. PubMed ID: 36269370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Exact monitoring of aortic diameters in Marfan patients without gadolinium contrast: intraindividual comparison of 2D SSFP imaging with 3D CE-MRA and echocardiography.
    Veldhoen S, Behzadi C, Derlin T, Rybczinsky M, von Kodolitsch Y, Sheikhzadeh S, Henes FO, Bley TA, Adam G, Bannas P.
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Mar; 25(3):872-82. PubMed ID: 25316057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intraindividual comparison of 1.5 T and 3 T non-contrast MR angiography for monitoring of aortic root diameters in Marfan patients.
    Avanesov M, Weinrich JM, Sinn M, Lenz A, von Düring F, Salamon J, Henes FO, Schönnagel BP, Adam G, von Kodolitsch Y, Bannas P.
    Int J Cardiol; 2021 Aug 15; 337():119-126. PubMed ID: 33933510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Thoracic aorta diameters in Marfan patients: Intraindividual comparison of 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) with transthoracic echocardiography.
    Gietzen C, Pennig L, von Stein J, Guthoff H, Weiss K, Gertz R, Thürbach I, Bunck AC, Maintz D, Baldus S, Ten Freyhaus H, Hohmann C, von Stein P.
    Int J Cardiol; 2023 Nov 01; 390():131203. PubMed ID: 37480997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Assessment of aortic root dimensions in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome: intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced and non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography with echocardiography.
    Bannas P, Groth M, Rybczynski M, Sheikhzadeh S, von Kodolitsch Y, Graessner J, Lund G, Adam G, Habermann CR.
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Jul 15; 167(1):190-6. PubMed ID: 22240770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Measuring aortic diameter with different MR techniques: comparison of three-dimensional (3D) navigated steady-state free-precession (SSFP), 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), 2D T2 black blood, and 2D cine SSFP.
    Potthast S, Mitsumori L, Stanescu LA, Richardson ML, Branch K, Dubinsky TJ, Maki JH.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan 15; 31(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 20027585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery.
    Veldhoen S, Behzadi C, Lenz A, Henes FO, Rybczynski M, von Kodolitsch Y, Bley TA, Adam G, Bannas P.
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Oct 30; 19(1):82. PubMed ID: 29084542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of native high-resolution 3D and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for assessing the thoracic aorta.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Gruettner H, Trauzeddel RF, Greiser A, Schulz-Menger J.
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun 30; 15(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 24399340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Reliability of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography-derived aortic diameters in Marfan patients: comparison of inner vs. outer vessel wall measurements.
    Weinrich JM, Avanesov M, Lenz A, Tahir E, Henes FO, Schoennagel BP, Rybczinsky M, Adam G, von Kodolitsch Y, Bannas P.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Aug 30; 36(8):1533-1542. PubMed ID: 32314122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Single breath-hold assessment of cardiac function using an accelerated 3D single breath-hold acquisition technique--comparison of an intravascular and extravascular contrast agent.
    Makowski MR, Wiethoff AJ, Jansen CH, Uribe S, Parish V, Schuster A, Botnar RM, Bell A, Kiesewetter C, Razavi R, Schaeffter T, Greil GF.
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jul 31; 14(1):53. PubMed ID: 22849703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of Cine-MRI and Transthoracic Echocardiography for the Assessment of Aortic Root Diameters in Patients with Suspected Marfan Syndrome.
    Bannas P, Rybczynski M, Sheikhzadeh S, von Kodolitsch Y, Derlin T, Yamamura J, Lund G, Adam G, Groth M.
    Rofo; 2015 Nov 31; 187(11):1022-8. PubMed ID: 26098252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Feasibility of performing non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography in pregnant subjects with familial aortopathies.
    Moody WE, Pickup L, Plunkett E, Fryearson J, Clift PF, Katie Morris R, Thompson PJ, Thorne S, Hudsmith LE.
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Oct 01; 244():354-357. PubMed ID: 28622940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Simultaneous Highly Efficient Contrast-Free Lumen and Vessel Wall MR Imaging for Anatomical Assessment of Aortic Disease.
    Munoz C, Fotaki A, Hua A, Hajhosseiny R, Kunze KP, Ismail TF, Neji R, Pushparajah K, Botnar RM, Prieto C.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Oct 01; 58(4):1110-1122. PubMed ID: 36757267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Unenhanced steady state free precession versus traditional MR imaging for congenital heart disease.
    Chang D, Kong X, Zhou X, Li S, Wang H.
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct 01; 82(10):1743-8. PubMed ID: 23639772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.