These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

214 related items for PubMed ID: 36270952

  • 41. Percent atheroma volume: Optimal variable to report whole-heart atherosclerotic plaque burden with coronary CTA, the PARADIGM study.
    van Rosendael AR, Lin FY, Ma X, van den Hoogen IJ, Gianni U, Al Hussein O, Al'Aref SJ, Peña JM, Andreini D, Al-Mallah MH, Budoff MJ, Cademartiri F, Chinnaiyan K, Choi JH, Conte E, Marques H, de Araújo Gonçalves P, Gottlieb I, Hadamitzky M, Leipsic JA, Maffei E, Pontone G, Raff GL, Shin S, Kim YJ, Lee BK, Chun EJ, Sung JM, Lee SE, Berman DS, Virmani R, Samady H, Stone PH, Narula J, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, Min JK, Chang HJ.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(5):400-406. PubMed ID: 32063545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Quantification and characterisation of coronary artery plaque volume and adverse plaque features by coronary computed tomographic angiography: a direct comparison to intravascular ultrasound.
    Nakazato R, Shalev A, Doh JH, Koo BK, Dey D, Berman DS, Min JK.
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2109-17. PubMed ID: 23553587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. CT coronary angiography: impact of adapted statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on coronary stenosis and plaque composition analysis.
    Fuchs TA, Fiechter M, Gebhard C, Stehli J, Ghadri JR, Kazakauskaite E, Herzog BA, Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Kaufmann PA.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Mar; 29(3):719-24. PubMed ID: 23053859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Reproducibility, accuracy, and predictors of accuracy for the detection of coronary atherosclerotic plaque composition by computed tomography: an ex vivo comparison to intravascular ultrasound.
    van der Giessen AG, Toepker MH, Donelly PM, Bamberg F, Schlett CL, Raffle C, Irlbeck T, Lee H, van Walsum T, Maurovich-Horvat P, Gijsen FJ, Wentzel JJ, Hoffmann U.
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Nov; 45(11):693-701. PubMed ID: 20479650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. In vivo CT detection of lipid-rich coronary artery atherosclerotic plaques using quantitative histogram analysis: a head to head comparison with IVUS.
    Marwan M, Taher MA, El Meniawy K, Awadallah H, Pflederer T, Schuhbäck A, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S.
    Atherosclerosis; 2011 Mar; 215(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21227419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Validation of hemodynamic stress calculation in coronary computed tomography angiography versus intravascular ultrasound.
    Ding Y, Liu Z, Wang X, Xin R, Shan D, He B, Jing J, Gao Q, Yang J, Chen Y.
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Apr 01; 13(4):2339-2351. PubMed ID: 37064396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Optimal boundary detection method and window settings for coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume analysis in coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Heo R, Park HB, Lee BK, Shin S, Arsanjani R, Min JK, Chang HJ.
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep 01; 26(9):3190-8. PubMed ID: 26630996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Interobserver Variability Between Expert, Experienced, and Novice Operator Affects Interpretation of Optical Coherence Tomography and 20 MHz Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging.
    Martin WG, McNaughton E, Bambrough PB, West NEJ, Hoole SP.
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Feb 01; 47():33-39. PubMed ID: 36207273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. The effect of iterative image reconstruction algorithms on the feasibility of automated plaque assessment in coronary CT angiography.
    Puchner SB, Ferencik M, Karolyi M, Do S, Maurovich-Horvat P, Kauczor HU, Hoffmann U, Schlett CL.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec 01; 29(8):1879-88. PubMed ID: 23990390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Coronary CT angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for estimation of coronary stenosis and atherosclerotic plaque burden: a meta-analysis.
    Fischer C, Hulten E, Belur P, Smith R, Voros S, Villines TC.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013 Dec 01; 7(4):256-66. PubMed ID: 24148779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. In vivo relationship between near-infrared spectroscopy-detected lipid-rich plaques and morphological plaque characteristics by optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound: a multimodality intravascular imaging study.
    Zanchin C, Ueki Y, Losdat S, Fahrni G, Daemen J, Ondracek AS, Häner JD, Stortecky S, Otsuka T, Siontis GCM, Rigamonti F, Radu M, Spirk D, Kaiser C, Engstrom T, Lang I, Koskinas KC, Räber L.
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jun 22; 22(7):824-834. PubMed ID: 31990323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Total coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden assessment by CT angiography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease associated with myocardial perfusion abnormalities.
    Kishi S, Magalhães TA, Cerci RJ, Matheson MB, Vavere A, Tanami Y, Kitslaar PH, George RT, Brinker J, Miller JM, Clouse ME, Lemos PA, Niinuma H, Reiber JH, Rochitte CE, Rybicki FJ, Di Carli MF, Cox C, Lima JA, Arbab-Zadeh A.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016 Jun 22; 10(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 26817414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Predictive performance of dual modality of computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound for no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary stenting in stable coronary artery disease.
    Okutsu M, Horio T, Tanaka H, Akiyama M, Okimoto N, Tsubouchi T, Kawajiri K, Ohashi Y, Sumitsuji S, Ikari Y.
    Heart Vessels; 2018 Oct 22; 33(10):1121-1128. PubMed ID: 29644449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Per-lesion versus per-patient analysis of coronary artery disease in predicting the development of obstructive lesions: the Progression of AtheRosclerotic PlAque DetermIned by Computed TmoGraphic Angiography Imaging (PARADIGM) study.
    Lee SE, Sung JM, Andreini D, Al-Mallah MH, Budoff MJ, Cademartiri F, Chinnaiyan K, Choi JH, Chun EJ, Conte E, Gottlieb I, Hadamitzky M, Kim YJ, Lee BK, Leipsic JA, Maffei E, Marques H, de Araújo Gonçalves P, Pontone G, Shin S, Stone PH, Samady H, Virmani R, Narula J, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Bax JJ, Lin FY, Min JK, Chang HJ.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Dec 22; 36(12):2357-2364. PubMed ID: 32779077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.