These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

312 related items for PubMed ID: 36331191

  • 1. Left Lateralization of the Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potential Reflects Aided Processing and Speech-in-Noise Performance of Older Listeners With a Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C, Kuk F, Korhonen P.
    Ear Hear; ; 44(2):399-410. PubMed ID: 36331191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction on Subcortical and Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C, Kuk F, Korhonen P.
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1282-1293. PubMed ID: 32058351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit.
    Kuk F, Seper E, Lau CC, Korhonen P.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):698-707. PubMed ID: 28906241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Bentler RA, Stanziola RW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of Amplification on Neural Phase Locking, Amplitude, and Latency to a Speech Syllable.
    Jenkins KA, Fodor C, Presacco A, Anderson S.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Jun; 39(4):810-824. PubMed ID: 29287038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F, Lau CC, Korhonen P, Crose B.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B, Debener S, Schmidt J, Jaeger M, Neher T.
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L, Dillon H, Seymour J, Seeto M, Van Dun B.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE, Wilson RH, Larson V, Williams D.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An Integrative Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Directional Microphone and Noise-Reduction Algorithm under Realistic Signal-to-Noise Ratios.
    Kuk F, Slugocki C, Korhonen P.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):262-270. PubMed ID: 31589137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Using the Repeat-Recall Test to Examine Factors Affecting Context Use.
    Kuk F, Slugocki C, Korhonen P.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Nov; 31(10):771-780. PubMed ID: 33588513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Efficacy of a reverse cardioid directional microphone.
    Kuk F, Keenan D.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 22284842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V, Purcell DW, Aiken SJ, Parsa V, Scollie SD.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F, Jackson A, Keenan D, Lau CC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.
    Billings CJ, Penman TM, McMillan GP, Ellis EM.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jun; 36(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 26502191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA, Picou EM.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Desjardins JL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.