These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

258 related items for PubMed ID: 36355200

  • 1. Rapid 3D breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography using deep learning-constrained compressed sensing reconstruction.
    Zhang Y, Peng W, Xiao Y, Ming Y, Ma K, Hu S, Zeng W, Zeng L, Liang Z, Zhang X, Xia C, Li Z.
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2500-2509. PubMed ID: 36355200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Compressed Sensing and Gradient and Spin-Echo in Breath-Hold 3D MR Cholangiopancreatography: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.
    Jang W, Song JS, Kim SH, Yang JD.
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Apr 01; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33915832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparisons between image quality and diagnostic performance of 2D- and breath-hold 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3T.
    Yoen H, Lee JM, Lee SM, Kang HJ, Bae JS, Kim E, Peeters JM, Yoon JH.
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov 01; 31(11):8399-8407. PubMed ID: 33884471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparing compressed sensing breath-hold 3D MR cholangiopancreatography with two parallel imaging MRCP strategies in main pancreatic duct and common bile duct.
    Chen Z, Sun B, Xue Y, Duan Q, Zheng E, He Y, Li G, Zhang Z.
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep 01; 142():109833. PubMed ID: 34218123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison between gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) and compressed sensing sequences for single breath-hold three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with T1 hyperintense bile.
    Morimoto-Ishikawa D, Hyodo T, Takenaka M, Matsukubo Y, Numoto I, Itoh M, Ohmi M, Kamata K, Ueda Y, Wakana M, Kudo M, Saito S, Ishii K.
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 May 01; 150():110279. PubMed ID: 35364450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. GRASE Revisited: breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a Gradient and Spin Echo (GRASE) technique at 3T.
    Nam JG, Lee JM, Kang HJ, Lee SM, Kim E, Peeters JM, Yoon JH.
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep 01; 28(9):3721-3728. PubMed ID: 29392471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Modified breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography with a small field-of-view and high resolution acquisition: Clinical feasibility in biliary and pancreatic disorders.
    Zhu L, Xue H, Sun Z, Qian T, Weiland E, Kuehn B, Asbach P, Hamm B, Jin Z.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov 01; 48(5):1389-1399. PubMed ID: 29656611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Feasibility of 3D Breath-Hold MR Cholangiopancreatography with a Spatially Selective Radiofrequency Excitation Pulse: Prospective Comparison with Parallel Imaging Technique and Compressed Sensing Method.
    Chen Z, Xue Y, Wu Y, Duan Q, Zheng E, He Y, Li G, Song Y, Sun B.
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Dec 01; 29(12):e289-e295. PubMed ID: 35370045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Compressed-Sensing Accelerated 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: Application in Suspected Pancreatic Diseases.
    Zhu L, Wu X, Sun Z, Jin Z, Weiland E, Raithel E, Qian T, Xue H.
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Mar 01; 53(3):150-157. PubMed ID: 28976478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T and impact of individual factors on image quality.
    Blaise H, Remen T, Ambarki K, Weiland E, Kuehn B, Orry X, Laurent V.
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep 01; 142():109873. PubMed ID: 34371309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical Feasibility of 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Using Compressed Sensing: Comparison of Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance.
    Yoon JH, Lee SM, Kang HJ, Weiland E, Raithel E, Son Y, Kiefer B, Lee JM.
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Oct 01; 52(10):612-619. PubMed ID: 28448309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Deep learning-based reconstruction and 3D hybrid profile order technique for MRCP at 3T: evaluation of image quality and acquisition time.
    Shiraishi K, Nakaura T, Uetani H, Nagayama Y, Kidoh M, Kobayashi N, Morita K, Yamahita Y, Tanaka Y, Baba H, Hirai T.
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov 01; 33(11):7585-7594. PubMed ID: 37178197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison and evaluation of the efficacy of compressed SENSE (CS) and gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) in breath-hold (BH) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
    He M, Xu J, Sun Z, Wang S, Zhu L, Wang X, Wang J, Feng F, Xue H, Jin Z.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Mar 01; 51(3):824-832. PubMed ID: 31313426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical Evaluation of Respiratory-triggered 3D MRCP with Navigator Echoes Compared to Breath-hold Acquisition Using Compressed Sensing and/or Parallel Imaging.
    Kromrey ML, Funayama S, Tamada D, Ichikawa S, Shimizu T, Onishi H, Motosugi U.
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2020 Dec 01; 19(4):318-323. PubMed ID: 31645536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Rapid 3D navigator-triggered MR cholangiopancreatography with SPACE sequence at 3T: only one-third acquisition time of conventional 3D SPACE navigator-triggered MRCP.
    Sun B, Chen Z, Duan Q, Xue Y, Zheng E, He Y, Lin L, Li G, Zhang Z.
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jan 01; 45(1):134-140. PubMed ID: 31781898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared to free-breathing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective study of image quality and diagnostic performance in pancreatic disorders.
    Mannes I, Dallongeville A, Badat N, Beaussier H, Chatellier G, Zins M.
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Apr 01; 45(4):1082-1091. PubMed ID: 31598763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Optimized Breath-Hold Compressed-Sensing 3D MR Cholangiopancreatography at 3T: Image Quality Analysis and Clinical Feasibility Assessment.
    Song JS, Kim SH, Kuehn B, Paek MY.
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Jun 05; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 32517113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 Tesla: Image quality comparison between 3D compressed sensing and 2D single-shot acquisitions.
    Lohöfer FK, Kaissis GA, Rasper M, Katemann C, Hock A, Peeters JM, Schlag C, Rummeny EJ, Karampinos D, Braren RF.
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun 05; 115():53-58. PubMed ID: 31084759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with GRASE sequence at 3.0T: does it improve image quality and acquisition time as compared with 3D TSE?
    Yoshida M, Nakaura T, Inoue T, Tanoue S, Takada S, Utsunomiya D, Tsumagari S, Harada K, Yamashita Y.
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun 05; 28(6):2436-2443. PubMed ID: 29335869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with compressed sensing at 1.5 T: clinical application for the evaluation of branch duct IPMN of the pancreas.
    Henninger B, Steurer M, Plaikner M, Weiland E, Jaschke W, Kremser C.
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov 05; 30(11):6014-6021. PubMed ID: 32556465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.