These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
179 related items for PubMed ID: 3636287
21. Baby Doe redux: doctors as child abusers. Annas GJ. Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 6643033 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The civil rights of handicapped infants: an Oklahoma "experiment". Gerry MH. Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):15-66. PubMed ID: 2931398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Do the "Baby Doe" rules ignore suffering? Kopelman LM. Second Opin; 1993 Apr; 18(4):101-13. PubMed ID: 10125415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Murder, she wrote or was it merely selective nontreatment? Smith GP. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992 Apr; 8():49-71. PubMed ID: 10118990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. In re K.I.: an urgent need for a uniform system in the treatment of the critically ill infant--recognizing the sanctity of life of the child. Guevara AL. Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 2001 Apr; 36(1):237-60. PubMed ID: 16523587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Baby Doe rules. Angell M. N Engl J Med; 1986 Mar 06; 314(10):642-4. PubMed ID: 2935736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe. Minow M. Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985 Mar 06; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The final, anticlimactic rule on Baby Doe. Murray TH. Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Jun 06; 15(3):5-9. PubMed ID: 4019172 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The 'Baby Doe' rule. Stevenson DK, Ariagno RL, Kutner JS, Raffin TA, Young EW. JAMA; 1986 Apr 11; 255(14):1909-12. PubMed ID: 3951118 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Ethical dilemmas in the treatment of critically ill newborns. Brooks BF. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985 Apr 11; 1(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 10280374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1986 developments. National Legal Center Staff. Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan 11; 2(4):255-76. PubMed ID: 2951349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Baby Doe regulations: views from perinatal social workers. York GY, Gallarno RM. J Perinatol; 1990 Sep 11; 10(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 2145406 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The legal side. "Do not feed...". Cushing M. Am J Nurs; 1983 Apr 11; 83(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 6551143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma? Shapiro RS, Barthel R. Hastings Law J; 1986 May 11; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Baby Doe, Congress and the states: challenging the federal treatment standard for impaired infants. Newman SA. Am J Law Med; 1989 May 11; 15(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 2764010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Should imperfect infants survive? The 'Baby Doe' regs. Baer S. Natl Rev; 1983 Sep 02; 35(17):1069, 1092-3. PubMed ID: 16440474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Medical groups' suit seeks to put legal padlock on 'Baby Doe' reg. Gibbons DL. Med World News; 1984 Apr 09; 25(7):19, 23. PubMed ID: 10267469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Right to refuse life-sustaining treatment. Gustaitis R. Pediatrics; 1988 Feb 09; 81(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 3340483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Backsliding on "Baby Doe"? Med World News; 1985 Mar 11; 26(5):11, 15. PubMed ID: 10317572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Congress faces fragile compromise on 'Baby Doe'. Med World News; 1984 Aug 27; 25(16):6-7, 10. PubMed ID: 10268025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]