These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase. Bonino AY, Leibold LJ, Buss E. Ear Hear; 2013 Sep 01; 34(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22836239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of Susceptibility to Noise and Speech Masking Among School-Age Children With Hearing Loss or Typical Hearing. Lalonde K, Walker EA, Leibold LJ, McCreery RW. Ear Hear; 2013 Sep 01; 45(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 37415268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners. Grant KW, Walden TC. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr 01; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Recognition Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch in Children With Hearing Loss. Leibold LJ, Browning JM, Buss E. Ear Hear; 2020 Apr 01; 41(2):259-267. PubMed ID: 31365355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers. Corbin NE, Bonino AY, Buss E, Leibold LJ. Ear Hear; 2016 Apr 01; 37(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 26226605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation. Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Wendt D, Naylor G, Wang Y, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE. Hear Res; 2017 Aug 01; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR. Ear Hear; 2007 Sep 01; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing. Lalonde K, McCreery RW. Ear Hear; 2020 Sep 01; 41(4):705-719. PubMed ID: 32032226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding. Rosen S, Souza P, Ekelund C, Majeed AA. J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr 01; 133(4):2431-43. PubMed ID: 23556608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing. Buss E, Leibold LJ, Porter HL, Grose JH. J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr 01; 141(4):2650. PubMed ID: 28464682 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech. Calandruccio L, Buss E, Bowdrie K. Trends Hear; 2017 Apr 01; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response. Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, Naylor G, Zekveld AA, Lunner T. Hear Res; 2018 Aug 01; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]