These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
155 related items for PubMed ID: 36494661
21. A meta-analysis of low Hartmann's procedure versus abdominoperineal resection for non-restorative treatment of rectal cancer. Ahmad NZ, Azam M, Coffey JC. Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Dec; 36(12):2585-2598. PubMed ID: 34272997 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Low Hartmann's procedure or intersphincteric proctectomy for distal rectal cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study. Westerduin E, Musters GD, van Geloven AAW, Westerterp M, van der Harst E, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Nov; 32(11):1583-1589. PubMed ID: 28801697 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Hartmann's procedure versus intersphincteric abdominoperineal excision (HiP Study): a multicentre prospective cohort study. Fowler H, Clifford R, Sutton P, Watson A, Fearnhead N, Bach S, Moran B, Rose A, Jackson R, Vimalachandran D, HiP collaborators. Colorectal Dis; 2020 Dec; 22(12):2114-2122. PubMed ID: 32939956 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Hartmann's procedure vs. abdominoperineal resection for palliation of advanced low rectal cancer. Heah SM, Eu KW, Ho YH, Leong AF, Seow-Choen F. Dis Colon Rectum; 1997 Nov; 40(11):1313-7. PubMed ID: 9369105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Hartmann's procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis (LADIES): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label, superiority trial. Lambrichts DPV, Vennix S, Musters GD, Mulder IM, Swank HA, Hoofwijk AGM, Belgers EHJ, Stockmann HBAC, Eijsbouts QAJ, Gerhards MF, van Wagensveld BA, van Geloven AAW, Crolla RMPH, Nienhuijs SW, Govaert MJPM, di Saverio S, D'Hoore AJL, Consten ECJ, van Grevenstein WMU, Pierik REGJM, Kruyt PM, van der Hoeven JAB, Steup WH, Catena F, Konsten JLM, Vermeulen J, van Dieren S, Bemelman WA, Lange JF, LADIES trial collaborators. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Aug; 4(8):599-610. PubMed ID: 31178342 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Correlation between ASA Grade with reversal of Hartmann's procedure - a retrospective study. Farah M, Sorelli P, Kerwat R, Oke O, Ng P. J Med Life; 2021 Aug; 14(6):756-761. PubMed ID: 35126744 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure. Khaikin M, Zmora O, Rosin D, Bar-Zakai B, Goldes Y, Shabtai M, Ayalon A, Munz Y. Surg Endosc; 2006 Dec; 20(12):1883-6. PubMed ID: 17024532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Low Hartmann's procedure versus abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer, a propensity score matching cohort study. Zhang X, Liu S, Liu L, Zhu Z. BMC Gastroenterol; 2024 Jun 05; 24(1):194. PubMed ID: 38840108 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Hartmann's procedure vs abdominoperineal resection with intersphincteric dissection in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized multicentre trial (HAPIrect). Smedh K, Sverrisson I, Chabok A, Nikberg M, HAPIrect Collaborative Study Group. BMC Surg; 2016 Jul 11; 16(1):43. PubMed ID: 27401339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Characteristics and risk factors associated with permanent stomas after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer. Seo SI, Yu CS, Kim GS, Lee JL, Yoon YS, Kim CW, Lim SB, Kim JC. World J Surg; 2013 Oct 11; 37(10):2490-6. PubMed ID: 23807125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: still a complicated operation. Horesh N, Rudnicki Y, Dreznik Y, Zbar AP, Gutman M, Zmora O, Rosin D. Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Feb 11; 22(2):81-87. PubMed ID: 29204724 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. What to do with the rectal stump during sphincter preserving rectal cancer resection with end colostomy: a collaborative snapshot study. Westerduin E, Aukema TS, van Geloven AAW, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Dutch Snapshot Research Group. Colorectal Dis; 2018 Aug 11; 20(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 29573105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Postoperative and long-term outcomes after redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: retrospective analysis of 50 patients and review of the literature. Genser L, Manceau G, Karoui M, Breton S, Brevart C, Rousseau G, Vaillant JC, Hannoun L. Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun 11; 56(6):747-55. PubMed ID: 23652749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term stoma-related reinterventions after anterior resection for rectal cancer with or without anastomosis: population data from the Dutch snapshot study. Hazen SJA, Vogel I, Borstlap WAA, Dekker JWT, Tuynman JB, Tanis PJ, Kusters M, Dutch Snapshot Research Group. Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Feb 11; 26(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 34837140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a retrospective review. Yang PF, Morgan MJ. ANZ J Surg; 2014 Dec 11; 84(12):965-9. PubMed ID: 24852339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. COMPARISON OF HARTMANN'S PROCEDURE VERSUS RESECTION WITH PRIMARY ANASTOMOSIS IN MANAGEMENT OF LEFT SIDED COLON CANCER OBSTRUCTION: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY. Merabishvili G, Mosidze B, Demetrashvili Z, Agdgomelashvili I. Georgian Med News; 2022 Mar 11; (324):21-25. PubMed ID: 35417858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]