These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

115 related items for PubMed ID: 3652236

  • 1. [Observations on the organization of audiometry facilities in workplaces with extreme noise levels].
    Turay J.
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1987 May; 36(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 3652236
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Instructions and techniques for reliable audiometric tests.
    Morrill JC.
    Occup Health Saf; 1984 Sep; 53(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 6504432
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Possibility of the diagnosis of occupational hearing loss during preventive mass screening].
    Pankova VB, Dmitrieva KA, Podol'skaia EV.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1988 Sep; (5):52-5. PubMed ID: 3067438
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Noise-induced hearing loss and industrial audiometry.
    Somerville ET.
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1976 Oct; 26(171):770-80. PubMed ID: 1003386
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Objective BERA audiometry in the evaluation of occupational hearing loss].
    Novotný Z.
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1986 Mar; 35(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 3955711
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Hearing control in people exposed to noise].
    Meyer H.
    Zentralbl Arbeitsmed; 1971 Oct; 21(10):320-7. PubMed ID: 5159739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. After the hearing test--what then?
    Cluff GL.
    Occup Health Saf; 1983 Mar; 52(3):14-5, 17-21. PubMed ID: 6856231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Monitoring of subjects to noise risk. Proposed methods of audiometric classification].
    Catenacci G, Terzi R, Marcaletti G, Prestinoni A, Capodaglio E.
    Med Lav; 1981 Mar; 72(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 7029233
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [The comparability of criteria for the evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss].
    Plundrich J.
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1979 Mar 01; 73(5):247-54. PubMed ID: 463096
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Importance of audiological study for resolving questions of work capacity expertise in occupational hearing impairment].
    Ostapkovich VE, Ponomareva NI.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1980 Mar 01; (2):57-60. PubMed ID: 7385509
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Noise-induced deafness.
    Muntz RH.
    Med J Aust; 1978 Sep 09; 2(6):272. PubMed ID: 732696
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Relation between occupational noise-induced hearing loss and presbycusis].
    Tománek R.
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1987 Mar 09; 36(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 3581224
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Industrial audiometry].
    Tománek R.
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1980 Jan 09; 29(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 7371087
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Presbycusis, sociocusis and occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Ward WD.
    Proc R Soc Med; 1971 Feb 09; 64(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 4251361
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.