These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

147 related items for PubMed ID: 36536321

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Validation of a Simple-to-Use, Affordable, Portable Wavefront Aberrometry-Based Auto Refractometer in a Paediatric Population.
    Rao DP, Negiloni K, Gurunathan S, Velkumar S, Sivaraman A, Baig AU, B K, Murali K.
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2022; 16():4281-4291. PubMed ID: 36578668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
    Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda KJ.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.
    Bennett JR, Stalboerger GM, Hodge DO, Schornack MM.
    J Optom; 2015 Feb; 8(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25498534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of a Portable Wavefront Aberrometer for Community Screening Refraction in the Elderly.
    Plum W, Varadaraj V, Dosto N, Thompson SL, Gajwani P, Friedman DS.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Mar 01; 98(3):289-294. PubMed ID: 33633020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of cycloplegia on the measurement of refractive error in Chinese children.
    Li T, Zhou X, Zhu J, Tang X, Gu X.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar 01; 102(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 30136309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy of a low-cost, portable, refractive error estimation device: Results of a diagnostic accuracy trial.
    Joseph S, Sundar B, Rashme VL, Venkatachalam S, Ehrlich JR, Ravilla T.
    PLoS One; 2022 Mar 01; 17(8):e0272451. PubMed ID: 35921350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Does the Accuracy and Repeatability of Refractive Error Estimates Depend on the Measurement Principle of Autorefractors?
    Padhy D, Bharadwaj SR, Nayak S, Rath S, Das T.
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jan 01; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 33505769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K, Parker KE, Cheng H, Applegate RA.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May 01; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.