These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

215 related items for PubMed ID: 36536437

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Database selection and data gathering methods in systematic reviews of qualitative research regarding diabetes mellitus - an explorative study.
    Justesen T, Freyberg J, Schultz ANØ.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr 30; 21(1):94. PubMed ID: 33941105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P.
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb 09; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?
    Aagaard T, Lund H, Juhl C.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov 22; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27875992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
    Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Wieland LS, Coles B, Weightman AL.
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep 25; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of information sources used in Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews: A case study in the field of anesthesiology and pain.
    Biocic M, Fidahic M, Cikes K, Puljak L.
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec 25; 10(4):597-605. PubMed ID: 31393677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
    Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM.
    Syst Rev; 2016 Mar 01; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A search of only four key databases would identify most randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A meta-epidemiological study.
    Guo Q, Cheng Y, Zhang C, Yang H, Chen X, Wang X, Yang L, Feng K, Long Y, Shao Z, Wang Y, Lin Y, Liao G, Huang J, Du L.
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 Sep 01; 13(5):622-631. PubMed ID: 35716041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assignment of adverse event indexing terms in randomized clinical trials involving spinal manipulative therapy: an audit of records in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.
    Gorrell LM, Engel RM, Lystad RP, Brown BT.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar 14; 17(1):41. PubMed ID: 28292267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.
    Hanneke R, Young SK.
    Syst Rev; 2017 Aug 08; 6(1):156. PubMed ID: 28789703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials.
    Hopewell S, Clarke M, Lefebvre C, Scherer R.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr 18; 2007(2):MR000001. PubMed ID: 17443625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.