These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

305 related items for PubMed ID: 36571837

  • 1. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
    Osman RB, Alharbi NM.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G, Cascos R, Antonaya-Martín JL, Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M.
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Intraoral Scans of Full Dental Arches: An In Vitro Measurement Study of the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners.
    Giuliodori G, Rappelli G, Aquilanti L.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar 08; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36981684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M, Cascos-Sánchez R, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Gómez-Polo M.
    J Dent; 2023 Mar 08; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study.
    Revilla-León M, Fernández-Estevan L, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA.
    J Dent; 2023 May 08; 132():104478. PubMed ID: 36889536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of impression-making methods in edentulous arches: An in vitro study encompassing conventional and digital methods.
    Li J, Moon HS, Kim JH, Yoon HI, Oh KC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep 08; 128(3):479-486. PubMed ID: 33583617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Impact of intraoral scanner, scanning strategy, and scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches: An in vitro study.
    Jamjoom FZ, Aldghim A, Aldibasi O, Yilmaz B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun 08; 131(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 36841708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
    Resende CCD, Barbosa TAQ, Moura GF, Tavares LDN, Rizzante FAP, George FM, Neves FDD, Mendonça G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb 08; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.