These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

228 related items for PubMed ID: 36586195

  • 21. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Bezerra HG, Attizzani GF, Sirbu V, Musumeci G, Lortkipanidze N, Fujino Y, Wang W, Nakamura S, Erglis A, Guagliumi G, Costa MA.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Intravascular imaging modalities in coronary intervention: Insights from 3D-printed phantom coronary models.
    Oliveira C, Brito J, Rodrigues T, Santiago H, Ricardo D, Cardoso P, Pinto FJ, Silva Marques J.
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2023 Jul; 42(7):629-639. PubMed ID: 36893842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Optical coherence tomography assessment of incidence, morphological characteristics, and spontaneous healing course of edge dissections following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Antonsen L, Thayssen P, Hansen HS, Junker A, Veien KT, Hansen KN, Hougaard M, Jensen LO.
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Nov 15; 223():466-474. PubMed ID: 27544607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Factors determining the frequency of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound use in patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions in recent years: Analysis based on a large national registry.
    Januszek R, Siudak Z, Malinowski KP, Wańha W, Surowiec S, Heba G, Pawlik A, Kameczura T, Wojakowski W, Jaguszewski M, Kołodziej A, Bryniarski L, Bartuś K, Surdacki A, Dobrzycki S, Legutko J, Bartuś S.
    Kardiol Pol; 2023 Nov 15; 81(10):969-977. PubMed ID: 37401576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparison Between Optical Frequency Domain Imaging and Intravascular Ultrasound for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance in Biolimus A9-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized MISTIC-1 Non-Inferiority Trial.
    Muramatsu T, Ozaki Y, Nanasato M, Ishikawa M, Nagasaka R, Ohota M, Hashimoto Y, Yoshiki Y, Takatsu H, Ito K, Kamiya H, Yoshida Y, Murohara T, Izawa H, MISTIC-1 Investigators.
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov 15; 13(11):e009314. PubMed ID: 33106049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. IVUS-Guided Versus OCT-Guided Coronary Stent Implantation: A Critical Appraisal.
    Maehara A, Matsumura M, Ali ZA, Mintz GS, Stone GW.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec 15; 10(12):1487-1503. PubMed ID: 29216976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.
    Alsidawi S, Effat M, Rahman S, Abdallah M, Leesar M.
    Cardiovasc Ther; 2015 Dec 15; 33(6):360-6. PubMed ID: 26363283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A Practical Approach to Assessing Stent Results with IVUS or OCT.
    Hachinohe D, Mitomo S, Candilio L, Latib A.
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2018 Dec 15; 14(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 29623170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Clinical Outcomes Following Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 31 Studies and 17,882 Patients.
    Buccheri S, Franchina G, Romano S, Puglisi S, Venuti G, D'Arrigo P, Francaviglia B, Scalia M, Condorelli A, Barbanti M, Capranzano P, Tamburino C, Capodanno D.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec 26; 10(24):2488-2498. PubMed ID: 29153502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Trends and Outcomes 2010-2019.
    Machanahalli Balakrishna A, Ismayl M, Walters RW, Aboeata A, Gowda RM, Vallabhajosyula S, Goldsweig AM, Dahal K.
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2022 Sep 26; 47(9):101270. PubMed ID: 35640848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Quantitative precision of optical frequency domain imaging: direct comparison with frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Kobayashi Y, Kitahara H, Tanaka S, Okada K, Kimura T, Ikeno F, Yock PG, Fitzgerald PJ, Honda Y.
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Apr 26; 31(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 26271203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Accurate Stent Placement in Challenging Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Using the Stent Positioning Assist System.
    Agostoni P, Kortsmit J, Colombo A.
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Oct 26; 43():123-129. PubMed ID: 35537934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A Comparison of Intravascular Imaging Modalities for Detection of Stent Struts in Acute Coronary Syndrome.
    Hyeon SH, Lee WS, Kim DI, Shin ES, Kim KS, Hong YJ, Lee SY, Won H, Kim TH, Kim SW.
    J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Feb 26; 29(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 26864953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.