These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


193 related items for PubMed ID: 36625810

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Association Between Regulatory Submission Characteristics and Recalls of Medical Devices Receiving 510(k) Clearance.
    Everhart AO, Sen S, Stern AD, Zhu Y, Karaca-Mandic P.
    JAMA; 2023 Jan 10; 329(2):144-156. PubMed ID: 36625811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Research: Evaluation of Orthopedic Hip Device Recalls by the FDA from 2007 to 2017.
    Peters W, Pellerin C, Janney C.
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2020 Nov 01; 54(6):418-426. PubMed ID: 33339030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Risk of Recall Among Medical Devices Undergoing US Food and Drug Administration 510(k) Clearance and Premarket Approval, 2008-2017.
    Dubin JR, Simon SD, Norrell K, Perera J, Gowen J, Cil A.
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May 03; 4(5):e217274. PubMed ID: 33956132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Medical device recalls and the FDA approval process.
    Zuckerman DM, Brown P, Nissen SE.
    Arch Intern Med; 2011 Jun 13; 171(11):1006-11. PubMed ID: 21321283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Recalls of Moderate- and High-Risk Otolaryngologic Devices Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 2003-2019.
    Talati IA, Parsa KM, Gao WZ.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Nov 13; 167(5):832-838. PubMed ID: 35290135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Class I Recalls of Cardiovascular Devices Between 2013 and 2022 : A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
    See C, Mooghali M, Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Krumholz HM, Kadakia KT.
    Ann Intern Med; 2024 Nov 13; 177(11):1499-1508. PubMed ID: 39284187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Overview of high-risk medical device recalls in obstetrics and gynecology from 2002 through 2016: implications for device safety.
    Janetos TM, Ghobadi CW, Xu S, Walter JR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul 13; 217(1):42-46.e1. PubMed ID: 28500861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Incremental Revisions across the Life Span of Ophthalmic Devices after Initial Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval, 1979-2015.
    Gopal AD, Rathi VK, Teng CC, Del Priore L, Ross JS.
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Aug 13; 124(8):1237-1246. PubMed ID: 28501378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Recalls and Premarket Review Systems for High-Risk Medical Devices in Japan.
    Nakayama M, Tanaka S, Hamada S, Uchida T, Kawakami K.
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 Nov 13; 53(6):775-780. PubMed ID: 30526015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The regulatory ancestral network of surgical meshes.
    Zargar N, Carr A.
    PLoS One; 2018 Nov 13; 13(6):e0197883. PubMed ID: 29920525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Major FDA medical device recalls in ophthalmology from 2003 to 2015.
    Talati RK, Gupta AS, Xu S, Ghobadi CW.
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr 13; 53(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 29631834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.