These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


191 related items for PubMed ID: 36639878

  • 1. Patient-Specific Orbital Implants Vs. Pre-Formed Implants for Internal Orbital Reconstruction.
    Landau Prat D, Massarwa S, Zohar A, Priel A, Sagiv O, Zloto O, Ben Simon GJ.
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 38(4):365-370. PubMed ID: 36639878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Orbital Bony Reconstruction With Presized and Precontoured Porous Polyethylene-Titanium Implants.
    Blessing NW, Rong AJ, Tse BC, Erickson BP, Lee BW, Johnson TE.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 May; 37(3):284-289. PubMed ID: 32976336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical application of automated virtual orbital reconstruction for orbital fracture management with patient-specific implants: A prospective comparative study.
    Chepurnyi Y, Zhukovtseva O, Kopchak A, Kanura O.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 50(9):686-691. PubMed ID: 35963834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Patient-specific Implants for Orbital Fractures: A Systematic Review.
    Maher DI, Hall AJ, Gwini S, Ben Artsi E.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Sep; 38(5):417-424. PubMed ID: 34750315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Analysis of complications after surgical repair of orbital fractures.
    Brucoli M, Arcuri F, Cavenaghi R, Benech A.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 22(4):1387-90. PubMed ID: 21772169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparative study of porous polyethylene versus absorbable polydextro- and polylevolactic-lactide plate in reconstruction of isolated medial orbital wall fracture.
    Cha HG, Nam SM, Kim YB, Park ES, Choi CY.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Feb; 75(2):782-787. PubMed ID: 34690092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Diplopia and enophthalmos after surgical repair of blowout fracture.
    Hoşal BM, Beatty RL.
    Orbit; 2002 Mar; 21(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 12029579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Use of porous polyethylene with embedded titanium in orbital reconstruction: a review of 106 patients.
    Garibaldi DC, Iliff NT, Grant MP, Merbs SL.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Mar; 23(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 18030113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Generation of customized orbital implant templates using 3-dimensional printing for orbital wall reconstruction.
    Kang S, Kwon J, Ahn CJ, Esmaeli B, Kim GB, Kim N, Sa HS.
    Eye (Lond); 2018 Dec; 32(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 30154573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Technical concept of patient-specific, ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene orbital wall implant.
    Kozakiewicz M, Elgalal M, Walkowiak B, Stefanczyk L.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 23333489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.