These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

121 related items for PubMed ID: 36682896

  • 1. Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study.
    Revilla-León M, Agustín-Panadero R, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):964-972. PubMed ID: 36682896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study.
    Revilla-León M, Fernández-Estevan L, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA.
    J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104478. PubMed ID: 36889536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Yilmaz B, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 37365066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Discrepancies of centric occlusion located by using a conventional method and four intraoral scanners combined with a computer-aided design program: A pilot investigation.
    Revilla-León M, Ntovas P, Barmak AB, Fernández-Estevan L, Agustín-Panadero R, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul 31. PubMed ID: 39089927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of maximum intercuspal position located by using four intraoral scanners and an artificial intelligence-based program.
    Revilla-León M, Fernández-Estevan L, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 10. PubMed ID: 38604907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
    Vag J, Stevens CD, Badahman MH, Ludlow M, Sharp M, Brenes C, Mennito A, Renne W.
    J Dent; 2023 Dec 10; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug 10; 132(2):435-440. PubMed ID: 36349566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based program for locating the maxillomandibular relationship of scans acquired by using intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar 07. PubMed ID: 38458860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Scanning accuracy and scanning area discrepancies of intraoral digital scans acquired at varying scanning distances and angulations among 4 different intraoral scanners.
    Button H, Kois JC, Barmak AB, Zeitler JM, Rutkunas V, Revilla-León M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov 07; 132(5):1044-1060. PubMed ID: 36872156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Trueness of maxillomandibular relationship in 3D-printed and conventional casts.
    Auškalnis L, Akulauskas M, Osnes C, Revilla-León M, Kernen-Gintautė A, Rutkūnas V.
    J Dent; 2024 Sep 07; 148():105044. PubMed ID: 38710316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of apical finish line location of tooth preparations on the scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners with various focal lengths and scanning technologies.
    Revilla-León M, Fry E, Zeitler JM, Li J, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug 16. PubMed ID: 39153939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners.
    Azevedo L, Marques T, Karasan D, Fehmer V, Sailer I, Correia A, Gómez-Polo M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul 16; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of scan extension and starting quadrant on the accuracy of four intraoral scanners for fabricating tooth-supported crowns.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 18. PubMed ID: 38641480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Influence of interdental spaces and the palate on the accuracy of maxillary scans acquired using different intraoral scanners.
    Akl MA, Daifallah K, Pérez-Barquero JA, Barmak AB, Wee AG, Revilla-León M.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec 18; 32(S2):125-134. PubMed ID: 37591814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.