These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

186 related items for PubMed ID: 36724209

  • 1. Can a Computational Model Predict the Effect of Lesion Location on Cam-type Hip Impingement?
    Jones AC, Stewart TD, Maher N, Holton C.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Jul 01; 481(7):1432-1443. PubMed ID: 36724209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.
    Wells J, Nepple JJ, Crook K, Ross JR, Bedi A, Schoenecker P, Clohisy JC.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr 01; 475(4):1045-1054. PubMed ID: 27752989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Anatomic Predictors of Sagittal Hip and Pelvic Motions in Patients With a Cam Deformity.
    Ng KCG, Lamontagne M, Jeffers JRT, Grammatopoulos G, Beaulé PE.
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 May 01; 46(6):1331-1342. PubMed ID: 29517923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Can combining femoral and acetabular morphology parameters improve the characterization of femoroacetabular impingement?
    Bouma HW, Hogervorst T, Audenaert E, Krekel P, van Kampen PM.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr 01; 473(4):1396-403. PubMed ID: 25384428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Bipolar Hip: How Acetabular and Femoral Pathomorphology Affects Hip Motion in Femoral Acetabular Impingement Syndrome.
    Shin J, Adeyemi TF, Hobson T, Peters CL, Maak TG.
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Jul 01; 36(7):1864-1871. PubMed ID: 32169663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Computer-assisted modeling of osseous impingement and resection in femoroacetabular impingement.
    Bedi A, Dolan M, Magennis E, Lipman J, Buly R, Kelly BT.
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Feb 01; 28(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 22244100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of changes in pelvic tilt on range of motion to impingement and radiographic parameters of acetabular morphologic characteristics.
    Ross JR, Nepple JJ, Philippon MJ, Kelly BT, Larson CM, Bedi A.
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Oct 01; 42(10):2402-9. PubMed ID: 25060073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Morphologic Features of the Contralateral Femur in Patients With Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Resembles Mild Slip Deformity: A Matched Cohort Study.
    Hesper T, Bixby SD, Maranho DA, Miller P, Kim YJ, Novais EN.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Apr 01; 476(4):890-899. PubMed ID: 29481345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Differences in anatomical parameters between the affected and unaffected hip in patients with bilateral cam-type deformities.
    Ng KCG, Lamontagne M, Beaulé PE.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Mar 01; 33():13-19. PubMed ID: 26895447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Pattern of Acetabular Cartilage Wear Is Hip Morphology-dependent and Patient Demographic-dependent.
    Pascual-Garrido C, Li DJ, Grammatopoulos G, Yanik EL, Clohisy JC, ANCHOR Group.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 May 01; 477(5):1021-1033. PubMed ID: 30998630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients With Decreased Femoral Version Have Different Impingement Locations and Intra- and Extraarticular Anterior Subspine FAI on 3D-CT-Based Impingement Simulation: Implications for Hip Arthroscopy.
    Lerch TD, Boschung A, Todorski IAS, Steppacher SD, Schmaranzer F, Zheng G, Ryan MK, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M.
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Nov 01; 47(13):3120-3132. PubMed ID: 31539275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Physical Therapy May Not Be Successful for Patients With Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and May Result in Insufficient Hip Range of Motion When Femoral Anteversion Is Less Than 16° and α-Angle Is Greater Than 65°.
    Saito M, Kobayashi N, Honda H, Kamono E, Yukizawa Y, Choe H, Ike H, Kumagai K, Inaba Y.
    Arthroscopy; 2024 Mar 01; 40(3):766-776.e1. PubMed ID: 37479152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Femoral and acetabular features explain acetabular contact pressure sensitivity to hip internal rotation in persons with cam morphology: A finite element analysis.
    Cannon J, Rankin JW, Lewton KL, Liu J, Powers CM.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Jul 01; 107():106025. PubMed ID: 37302302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Small Random Angular Variations in Pelvic Tilt and Lower Extremity Can Cause Error in Static Image-based Preoperative Hip Arthroplasty Planning: A Computer Modeling Study.
    Eslam Pour A, Lazennec JY, Patel KP, Anjaria MP, Beaulé PE, Schwarzkopf R.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Apr 01; 480(4):818-828. PubMed ID: 35014975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?
    Atkins PR, Shin Y, Agrawal P, Elhabian SY, Whitaker RT, Weiss JA, Aoki SK, Peters CL, Anderson AE.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jan 01; 477(1):242-253. PubMed ID: 30179924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.