These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


103 related items for PubMed ID: 3675310

  • 21. Auditory brain stem responses from human infants: pure-tone masking profiles for clicks and filtered clicks.
    Folsom RC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Aug; 78(2):555-62. PubMed ID: 4031254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Analog and digital filtering of the brain stem auditory evoked response.
    Kavanagh KT, Franks R.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Jul; 98(7 Pt 1):508-14. PubMed ID: 2751210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effects of high-pass filter frequency and slope on BAEP amplitude, latency and wave form.
    Elton M, Scherg M, Von Cramon D.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 May; 57(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 6201344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.
    Owen GA, Burkard R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr; 89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. PubMed ID: 2045584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Masking effects on ABR waves I and V in infants and adults.
    Klein AJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):755-9. PubMed ID: 3958315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Effects of sympathetic stimulation on the round window compound action potential in the rat.
    Lee AH, Møller AR.
    Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 19(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 2865241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Highpass filtering of auditory evoked brain stem potentials (author's transl)].
    Kiessling J, Althaus V.
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981 Mar; 230(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 7295174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A comparison of maximum length and Legendre sequences for the derivation of brain-stem auditory-evoked responses at rapid rates of stimulation.
    Burkard R, Shi Y, Hecox KE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1656-64. PubMed ID: 2341669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparison of brain stem auditory evoked potentials for monaural and binaural stimuli.
    Ainslie PJ, Boston JR.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Aug; 49(3-4):291-302. PubMed ID: 6158405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.
    Burkard R, Voigt HF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2514-25. PubMed ID: 2745876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Middle latency responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in unanaesthetized guinea pigs.
    Popelár J, Syka J.
    Hear Res; 1993 May; 67(1-2):69-74. PubMed ID: 8340279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Maturation of cortical mismatch responses to occasional pitch change in early infancy: effects of presentation rate and magnitude of change.
    He C, Hotson L, Trainor LJ.
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):218-29. PubMed ID: 18722392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Deviance-Related Responses along the Auditory Hierarchy: Combined FFR, MLR and MMN Evidence.
    Shiga T, Althen H, Cornella M, Zarnowiec K, Yabe H, Escera C.
    PLoS One; 2015 Jan; 10(9):e0136794. PubMed ID: 26348628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: early latency components.
    Sims MH, Moore RE.
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2019-27. PubMed ID: 6497099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Changes in the auditory middle latency responses during all-night sleep recording.
    Jones LA, Baxter RJ.
    Br J Audiol; 1988 Nov; 22(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 3242718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Frequency spectra and filtering of the early auditory evoked potential].
    Tietze G, Kevanishvili Z.
    HNO; 1990 Nov; 38(11):399-407. PubMed ID: 2289897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Toward a strategy for analyzing the auditory middle-latency response waveform.
    McGee T, Kraus N, Manfredi C.
    Audiology; 1988 Nov; 27(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 3408395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in non-human primates.
    Kraus N, Smith DI, Reed NL, Willott J, Erwin J.
    Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 17(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 4019328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A comparison of brainstem, whole-nerve AP and single-fiber tuning curves in the gerbil: normative data.
    Dolan TG, Mills JH, Schmiedt RA.
    Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 17(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 4019331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking.
    Henry KR.
    Hear Res; 1986 Mar; 24(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3771377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.