These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
246 related items for PubMed ID: 36774459
21. Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the accuracy of the orthodontic mini-implants placed in the inter-radicular space by image-guided-based techniques. Mihit Mihit FZ, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Montiel-Company JM, Albaladejo Martínez A. BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun 12; 23(1):383. PubMed ID: 37308848 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr 12; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the accuracy of implant placement using different drilling systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study. Sittikornpaiboon P, Arunjaroensuk S, Kaboosaya B, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Aug 12; 23(4):635-643. PubMed ID: 34288341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Minimally Invasive Navigation-Guided Quad Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Fan S, Gielisch MW, Díaz L, Thiem DGE, Al-Nawas B, Kämmerer PW. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Aug 12; 38(2):367-373. PubMed ID: 37083908 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect on the performance of a dynamic navigation system of superimposing a standard tessellation language (STL) file obtained with an intraoral scan on a cone beam computer tomograph (CBCT). An experimental in vitro study. Jorba-García A, Ruiz-Romero V, Bara-Casaus JJ, Camps-Font O, Sánchez-Garcés MÁ, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E. J Dent; 2024 Sep 12; 148():105150. PubMed ID: 38909646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr 12; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of alveolar ridge morphology and guide-hole design on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery with two implant macro-designs: An in vitro study. Dulla FA, Couso-Queiruga E, Chappuis V, Yilmaz B, Abou-Ayash S, Raabe C. J Dent; 2023 Mar 12; 130():104426. PubMed ID: 36652971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro and in vivo accuracy of autonomous robotic vs. fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery. He J, Zhang Q, Wang X, Fu M, Zhang H, Song L, Pu R, Jiang Z, Yang G. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr 12; 26(2):385-401. PubMed ID: 38214435 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]