These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

162 related items for PubMed ID: 36791686

  • 1. Residual Hearing Does Not Influence the Effectiveness of Beamforming when Using a Cochlear Implant in Conjunction with Contralateral Routing of Signals.
    Stronks HC, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):262-271. PubMed ID: 36791686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Beamforming and Single-Microphone Noise Reduction: Effects on Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speech Recognition of Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Stronks HC, Briaire J, Frijns J.
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221112762. PubMed ID: 35862265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Residual Hearing Affects Contralateral Routing of Signals in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Stronks HC, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 33849023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Masked Speech Perception with Bone Conduction Device, Contralateral Routing of Signals Hearing Aid, and Cochlear Implant Use in Adults with Single-Sided Deafness: A Prospective Hearing Device Comparison using a Unified Testing Framework.
    Wesarg T, Kuntz I, Jung L, Wiebe K, Schatzer R, Brill S, Aschendorff A, Arndt S.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(4):271-289. PubMed ID: 38387454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Application of Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signal Technology in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss.
    Snapp HA, Hoffer ME, Spahr A, Rajguru S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):579-589. PubMed ID: 30541657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Benefit of Bimodal Hearing and Beamforming for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Langerak NC, Stronks HC, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 38447538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Contralateral Routing of Signal Yields Significant Speech in Noise Benefit for Unilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dwyer RT, Kessler D, Butera IM, Gifford RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 30461413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Using a cochlear implant processor as contralateral routing of signals device in unilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    Gawliczek T, Guignard J, Schmid C, Wimmer W, Caversaccio M, Kompis M, Weder S.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 279(2):645-652. PubMed ID: 33616750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Benefit of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral cochlear implant users.
    Weder S, Kompis M, Caversaccio M, Stieger C.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015 Feb; 20(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 25501444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Benefit of a Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) Microphone in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Kurien G, Hwang E, Smilsky K, Smith L, Lin VYW, Nedzelski J, Chen JM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e82-e88. PubMed ID: 30570612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Benefit of contralateral routing of signals for unilateral cochlear implant users.
    Taal CH, van Barneveld DC, Soede W, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):393. PubMed ID: 27475163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of a wireless contralateral routing of signal (CROS) device with the Advanced Bionics Naída CI Q90 sound processor.
    Ernst A, Baumgaertel RM, Diez A, Battmer RD.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jul; 20(4):182-189. PubMed ID: 30821202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM, Bowditch S, Anderson MJ, May B, Cox KM, Niparko JK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Monaural Beamforming in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: Effect of (A)symmetric Directivity and Noise Type.
    Devocht EM, Janssen AM, Chalupper J, Stokroos RJ, George EL.
    PLoS One; 2016 Feb; 11(8):e0160829. PubMed ID: 27537075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Advanced beamformers for cochlear implant users: acute measurement of speech perception in challenging listening conditions.
    Buechner A, Dyballa KH, Hehrmann P, Fredelake S, Lenarz T.
    PLoS One; 2014 Feb; 9(4):e95542. PubMed ID: 24755864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech Perception in Noise and Sound Localization for Cochlear Implant With Single-Sided Deafness Compared With Contralateral Routing of Signal Hearing Aids.
    Oyamada S, Takahashi M, Furutate S, Oka S, Kubota E, Sakurai A, Uekusa T, Watanabe K, Iwasaki S.
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr 01; 44(4):331-338. PubMed ID: 36946362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Weissgerber T, Rader T, Baumann U.
    PLoS One; 2015 Apr 01; 10(5):e0126133. PubMed ID: 25970594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.