These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

645 related items for PubMed ID: 36804735

  • 1. Metastatic Sites' Location and Impact on Patient Management After the Introduction of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Newly Diagnosed and Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review.
    Mattana F, Muraglia L, Rajwa P, Zattoni F, Marra G, Chiu PKF, Heidegger I, Kasivisvanathan V, Kesch CV, Olivier J, Preisser F, Thibault C, Valerio M, van den Bergh RCN, Gandaglia G, Ceci F, European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Party.
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 6(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 36804735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using 18F-PSMA PET/CT.
    Pianou NK, Stavrou PZ, Vlontzou E, Rondogianni P, Exarhos DN, Datseris IE.
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019 Apr; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Incorporating Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Management Decisions for Men with Newly Diagnosed or Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
    Bukavina L, Luckenbaugh AN, Hofman MS, Hope T, Kamran SC, Murphy DG, Yamoah K, Ost P.
    Eur Urol; 2023 Jun; 83(6):521-533. PubMed ID: 36404204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    von Eyben FE, Picchio M, von Eyben R, Rhee H, Bauman G.
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer-Updated Diagnostic Utility, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Distribution of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, Williams M, Udovicich C, Vela I, Christidis D, Bolton D, Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy DG.
    Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):403-417. PubMed ID: 30773328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
    Stabile A, Pellegrino A, Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, de Angelis M, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Cucchiara V, Gandaglia G, Raggi D, Necchi A, Karakiewicz P, Montorsi F, Briganti A.
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Chow KM, So WZ, Lee HJ, Lee A, Yap DWT, Takwoingi Y, Tay KJ, Tuan J, Thang SP, Lam W, Yuen J, Lawrentschuk N, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Chen K.
    Eur Urol; 2023 Jul; 84(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37032189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study.
    Lenis AT, Pooli A, Lec PM, Sadun TY, Johnson DC, Lebacle C, Fendler WP, Eiber M, Czernin J, Reiter RE, Calais J.
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32958451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A Prospective Comparison of 18F-prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-1007 Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Whole-body 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Diffusion-weighted Imaging, and Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography with Traditional Imaging in Primary Distant Metastasis Staging of Prostate Cancer (PROSTAGE).
    Anttinen M, Ettala O, Malaspina S, Jambor I, Sandell M, Kajander S, Rinta-Kiikka I, Schildt J, Saukko E, Rautio P, Timonen KL, Matikainen T, Noponen T, Saunavaara J, Löyttyniemi E, Taimen P, Kemppainen J, Dean PB, Blanco Sequeiros R, Aronen HJ, Seppänen M, Boström PJ.
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Use of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for detecting lymph node metastases in primary and recurrent prostate cancer and location of recurrence after radical prostatectomy: an overview of the current literature.
    Luiting HB, van Leeuwen PJ, Busstra MB, Brabander T, van der Poel HG, Donswijk ML, Vis AN, Emmett L, Stricker PD, Roobol MJ.
    BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 31680398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. How accurate is 68Gallium-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography / computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) on primary lymph node staging before radical prostatectomy in intermediate and high risk prostate cancer? A study of patient- and lymph node- based analyses.
    Erdem S, Simsek DH, Degirmenci E, Aydin R, Bagbudar S, Ozluk Y, Sanli Y, Sanli O, Ozcan F.
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Distribution of prostate cancer recurrences on gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (68 Ga-PSMA) positron-emission/computed tomography after radical prostatectomy with pathological node-positive extended lymph node dissection.
    Huits TH, Luiting HB, van der Poel HG, Nandurkar R, Donswijk M, Schaake E, Vogel W, Roobol MJ, Wit E, Stricker P, Emmett L, van Leeuwen PJ.
    BJU Int; 2020 Jun; 125(6):876-883. PubMed ID: 32181951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Multicenter External Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Positive Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen/Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Patients with Prostate Cancer Recurrence.
    Bianchi L, Castellucci P, Farolfi A, Droghetti M, Artigas C, Leite J, Corona P, Shagera QA, Moreira R, González C, Queiroz M, de Galiza Barbosa F, Schiavina R, Deandreis D, Fanti S, Ceci F.
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Feb; 6(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 34933814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Efficacy, Predictive Factors, and Prediction Nomograms for 68Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-ligand Positron-emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Early Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Rauscher I, Düwel C, Haller B, Rischpler C, Heck MM, Gschwend JE, Schwaiger M, Maurer T, Eiber M.
    Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):656-661. PubMed ID: 29358059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and Tumor Molecular Profiling on Risk Stratification, Treatment Choice, and Oncological Outcomes of Patients with Primary or Relapsed Prostate Cancer: An International Collaborative Review of the Existing Literature.
    Sood A, Kishan AU, Evans CP, Feng FY, Morgan TM, Murphy DG, Padhani AR, Pinto P, Van der Poel HG, Tilki D, Briganti A, Abdollah F.
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Feb; 7(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 37423774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.