These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

105 related items for PubMed ID: 368715

  • 1. Importance of imagery in maintenance of feedback-assisted relaxation over extinction trials.
    LeBoeuf A, Wilson C.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 1):824-6. PubMed ID: 368715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The augmenting role of biofeedback: effects of autogenic, imagery and music training on physiological indices and athletic performance.
    Blumenstein B, Bar-Eli M, Tenenbaum G.
    J Sports Sci; 1995 Aug; 13(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 7474048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of sensory modes of biofeedback in relaxation training of frontalis muscle.
    Chen W.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Dec; 53(3):875-80. PubMed ID: 7322785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Imagery encouragement absorption capacity, and relaxation during electromyograph biofeedback.
    Qualls PJ, Sheehan PW.
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1981 Aug; 41(2):370-9. PubMed ID: 7024505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of trainer's presence and response-contingent feedback in biofeedback-relaxation training.
    Hamberger LK, Lohr JM.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 7290862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An experiment to test generalization of feedback from frontalis EMG.
    Le Boeuf A.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Feb; 50(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 7367177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of auditory and visual feedback for EMG training.
    Gaudette M, Prins A, Kahane J.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 6866648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of frontalis biofeedback on subjective ratings of relaxation.
    Le Boeuf A.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Feb; 50(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 7367194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Heart rate and finger pulse amplitude during muscular relaxation with frontalis versus forearm EMG feedback.
    Sagberg F.
    Biol Psychol; 1979 Nov; 9(3):201-14. PubMed ID: 397838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of active and passive EMG biofeedback training on performance of motor and cognitive tasks.
    Sabourin M, Rioux S.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Dec; 49(3):831-5. PubMed ID: 394115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.