These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

122 related items for PubMed ID: 36872156

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Yilmaz B, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 37365066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M, Cascos-Sánchez R, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Gómez-Polo M.
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study.
    Revilla-León M, Agustín-Panadero R, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):964-972. PubMed ID: 36682896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of apical finish line location of tooth preparations on the scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners with various focal lengths and scanning technologies.
    Revilla-León M, Fry E, Zeitler JM, Li J, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug 16. PubMed ID: 39153939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G, Cascos R, Antonaya-Martín JL, Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M.
    J Dent; 2022 Jun 16; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
    Osman RB, Alharbi NM.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec 16; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based program for locating the maxillomandibular relationship of scans acquired by using intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar 07. PubMed ID: 38458860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of intraoral scanning using modified scan bodies for complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Li Y, Fang H, Yan Y, Geng W.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov 07; 132(5):994.e1-994.e8. PubMed ID: 39079817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.