These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

122 related items for PubMed ID: 36872156

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Evaluation of the accuracy of direct intraoral scanner impressions for digital post and core in various post lengths: An in-vitro study.
    Almalki A, Conejo J, Kutkut N, Blatz M, Hai Q, Anadioti E.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):673-679. PubMed ID: 37921014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
    Wu MT, Tang SX, Peng LY, Han YT, Su YC, Wang X.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun 09; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The impact of mandibular partial edentulous distal extension on virtual occlusal record accuracy when using two different intraoral scanners: An in vitro analysis.
    Tian J, Jung RE, Han Y, Mei Y, Di P.
    J Dent; 2024 Nov 09; 150():105303. PubMed ID: 39134116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Intraoral Scans of Full Dental Arches: An In Vitro Measurement Study of the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners.
    Giuliodori G, Rappelli G, Aquilanti L.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar 08; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36981684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Intraoral digital scans: Part 2-influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov 08; 124(5):575-580. PubMed ID: 31870612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner.
    Revilla-León M, Young K, Sicilia E, Cho SH, Kois JC.
    J Dent; 2022 May 08; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Influence of the surface humidity, implant angulation, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans.
    Gómez-Polo M, Ortega R, Sallorenzo A, Agustín-Panadero R, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Revilla-León M.
    J Dent; 2022 Dec 08; 127():104307. PubMed ID: 36162637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of the effects of cutting off, overlapping, and rescanning procedures on intraoral scanning accuracy.
    Revilla-León M, Sicilia E, Agustín-Panadero R, Gómez-Polo M, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov 08; 130(5):746-754. PubMed ID: 34998582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Application of the virtual-fit method for fixed complete denture cases designed on intraoral scans: Effect of cement spacing.
    Vag J, Romanszky L, Sersli G, DeFee M, Renne W, Mangano F, Borbola D.
    J Dent; 2024 Feb 08; 141():104780. PubMed ID: 37981046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study.
    Gómez-Polo M, Piedra-Cascón W, Methani MM, Quesada-Olmo N, Farjas-Abadia M, Revilla-León M.
    J Dent; 2021 Jul 08; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M, Subramanian SG, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR.
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb 08; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Influence of Implant ScanBody Material and Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions.
    Azevedo L, Marques T, Karasan D, Fehmer V, Sailer I, Correia A, Gómez Polo M.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Sep 27; 37(5):575-582. PubMed ID: 37729480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
    Diker B, Tak Ö.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug 27; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Influence of rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vivo study.
    Revilla-León M, Quesada-Olmo N, Gómez-Polo M, Sicilia E, Farjas-Abadia M, Kois JC.
    J Dent; 2021 Dec 27; 115():103851. PubMed ID: 34656658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Digital mounting accuracy of 2 intraoral scanners with a single anterior or bilateral posterior occlusal scan: A three-dimensional analysis.
    Cha C, Pyo SW, Chang JS, Kim S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct 27; 130(4):612.e1-612.e8. PubMed ID: 37633731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.