These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 36918066

  • 1. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Kang J, De Arrigunaga S, Freeman SE, Zhao Y, Lin M, Liebman DL, Roldan AM, Kim JA, Chang DS, Friedman DS, Elze T.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):509-520. PubMed ID: 36918066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Participant Experience Using Novel Perimetry Tests to Monitor Glaucoma Progression.
    Freeman SE, De Arrigunaga S, Kang J, Zhao Y, Roldán AM, Lin MM, Elze T, Liebman D, Chang DS, Friedman DS.
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Nov 01; 32(11):948-953. PubMed ID: 37671465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.
    Ahmed Y, Pereira A, Bowden S, Shi RB, Li Y, Ahmed IIK, Arshinoff SA.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022 Nov 01; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Nishida T, Eslani M, Weinreb RN, Arias J, Vasile C, Mohammadzadeh V, Moghimi S.
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Feb 01; 32(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 36223309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of a Novel Head-Mounted Objective Auto-perimetry (Gaze Analyzing Perimeter) and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Miyake M, Mori Y, Wada S, Yamada K, Shiraishi R, Numa S, Suda K, Kameda T, Ikeda H, Akagi T, Aibara T, Tamura H, Tsujikawa A.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2024 Feb 01; 7(5):445-453. PubMed ID: 38823680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparing a head-mounted virtual reality perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer for visual field testing in healthy and glaucoma patients.
    Phu J, Wang H, Kalloniatis M.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan 01; 44(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 37803502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet.
    Gupta V, Kong GXY, Singh A, Panigrahi A, Gupta S, Prea S, Vingrys AJ.
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 May 01; 13(5):10. PubMed ID: 38743410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A Comparison of Perimetric Results from a Tablet Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients.
    Kong YX, He M, Crowston JG, Vingrys AJ.
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2016 Nov 01; 5(6):2. PubMed ID: 27847689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields Tablet Perimeter Software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients.
    Kumar H, Thulasidas M.
    J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov 01; 2020():8384509. PubMed ID: 32908686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
    Rao HL, Raveendran S, James V, Dasari S, Palakurthy M, Reddy HB, Pradhan ZS, Rao DA, Puttaiah NK, Devi S.
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar 01; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Glaucoma Screening Using an iPad-Based Visual Field Test in a West African Population.
    Prince J, Thompson A, Mwanza JC, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Budenz DL.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022 Mar 01; 5(3):275-283. PubMed ID: 34537412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of Humphrey Field Analyzer and imo visual field test results in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss.
    Goukon H, Hirasawa K, Kasahara M, Matsumura K, Shoji N.
    PLoS One; 2019 Mar 01; 14(11):e0224711. PubMed ID: 31697732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Advanced Vision Analyzer-Virtual Reality Perimeter: Device Validation, Functional Correlation and Comparison with Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Narang P, Agarwal A, Srinivasan M, Agarwal A.
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Jun 01; 1(2):100035. PubMed ID: 36249304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Landers J, Sharma A, Goldberg I, Graham S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct 01; 91(10):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17389740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative Analysis of 10-2 Test on Advanced Vision Analyzer and Humphrey Perimeter in Glaucoma.
    Narang P, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Narang R, Sundaramoorthy L.
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2023 Jun 01; 3(2):100264. PubMed ID: 36846107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Correlation between high-pass resolution perimetry and standard threshold perimetry in subjects with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Iester M, Capris P, Altieri M, Zingirian M, Traverso CE.
    Int Ophthalmol; 1999 Jun 01; 23(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 11196128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Montesano G, Bryan SR, Crabb DP, Fogagnolo P, Oddone F, McKendrick AM, Turpin A, Lanzetta P, Perdicchi A, Johnson CA, Garway-Heath DF, Brusini P, Rossetti LM.
    Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb 01; 126(2):242-251. PubMed ID: 30114416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of the Performance of a Novel, Smartphone-based, Head-mounted Perimeter (GearVision) With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Pradhan ZS, Sircar T, Agrawal H, Rao HL, Bopardikar A, Devi S, Tiwari VN.
    J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr 01; 30(4):e146-e152. PubMed ID: 33596021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.