These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
124 related items for PubMed ID: 36939089
1. Clinical outcomes associated with blood-culture contamination are not affected by utilization of a rapid blood-culture identification system. Khan SL, Haynatzki G, Medcalf SJ, Rupp ME. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 44(10):1569-1575. PubMed ID: 36939089 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Examining the clinical impact of rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic testing for bloodstream infections in a national cohort of the Veterans Health Administration. Britt NS, Khader K, He T, Willson TM, Effiong A, Timbrook TT, Potter EM, Lodise TP. Pharmacotherapy; 2023 Jan; 43(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 36484553 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical consequences of contaminated blood cultures in adult hospitalized patients at an institution utilizing a rapid blood-culture identification system. Liaquat S, Baccaglini L, Haynatzki G, Medcalf SJ, Rupp ME. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 42(8):978-984. PubMed ID: 33298207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Integrating Rapid PCR-Based Blood Culture Identification Panel to an Established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the United Arab of Emirates. Nasef R, El Lababidi R, Alatoom A, Krishnaprasad S, Bonilla F. Int J Infect Dis; 2020 Feb; 91():124-128. PubMed ID: 31786245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Chiasson JM, Smith WJ, Jodlowski TZ, Kouma MA, Cutrell JB. J Pharm Pract; 2022 Oct; 35(5):722-729. PubMed ID: 33813935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid identification of bloodstream bacterial and fungal pathogens and their antibiotic resistance determinants from positively flagged blood cultures using the BioFire FilmArray blood culture identification panel. Kang CM, Chen XJ, Chih CC, Hsu CC, Chen PH, Lee TF, Teng LJ, Hsueh PR. J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2020 Dec; 53(6):882-891. PubMed ID: 32305272 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of the BioFire FilmArray blood culture identification panel when used in critically ill patients with sepsis. Rule R, Paruk F, Becker P, Neuhoff M, Chausse J, Said M. J Microbiol Methods; 2021 Oct; 189():106303. PubMed ID: 34411640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of rapid polymerase chain reaction-based organism identification of gram-positive cocci for patients with a single positive blood culture. MacVane SH, Raux BR, Smith TT. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2019 Aug; 38(8):1471-1479. PubMed ID: 31079314 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of the new FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel and its potential impact on clinical use in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia. Kanda N, Hashimoto H, Suzuki T, Nakamura K. J Infect Chemother; 2022 Jul; 28(7):1037-1040. PubMed ID: 35428573 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel on Detection of Pathogenic Microorganisms in Positive Blood Cultures: the First Clinical Report in Japan. Saito K, Endo S, Katsumi M, Ishizawa C, Fujikawa Y, Inomata S, Toyokawa M, Kaku M. Jpn J Infect Dis; 2018 Mar 22; 71(2):145-147. PubMed ID: 29279453 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is It Actionable? An Evaluation of the Rapid PCR-Based Blood Culture Identification Panel on the Management of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Blood Stream Infections. Tseng AS, Kasule SN, Rice F, Mi L, Chan L, Seville MT, Grys TE. Open Forum Infect Dis; 2018 Dec 22; 5(12):ofy308. PubMed ID: 30555850 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]