These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


228 related items for PubMed ID: 36965209

  • 21. A review of surrogate safety measures and their applications in connected and automated vehicles safety modeling.
    Wang C, Xie Y, Huang H, Liu P.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106157. PubMed ID: 33975090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A method for predicting crash configurations using counterfactual simulations and real-world data.
    Leledakis A, Lindman M, Östh J, Wågström L, Davidsson J, Jakobsson L.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105932. PubMed ID: 33341681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Connected vehicle-based road safety information system (CROSS): Framework and evaluation.
    Jo Y, Jang J, Park S, Oh C.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105972. PubMed ID: 33465744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Quantifying the Impact of Deployments of Autonomous Vehicles and Intelligent Roads on Road Safety in China: A Country-Level Modeling Study.
    Tan H, Zhao F, Song H, Liu Z.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb 24; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario.
    Russo F, Biancardo SA, Dell'Acqua G.
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014 Feb 24; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24279963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q, Wang X, Wu X, Glaser Y, He L.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep 24; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Assessing the collective safety of automated vehicle groups: A duration modeling approach of accumulated distances between crashes.
    Sohrabi S, Lord D, Dadashova B, Mannering F.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Apr 24; 198():107454. PubMed ID: 38290409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Understanding the effects of vehicle platoons on crash type and severity.
    Hyun KK, Mitra SK, Jeong K, Tok A.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan 24; 149():105858. PubMed ID: 33220605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Cooperative Intersection with Misperception in Partially Connected and Automated Traffic.
    Li C, Hu Z, Lu Z, Wen X.
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul 23; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles.
    Mahdinia I, Mohammadnazar A, Arvin R, Khattak AJ.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar 23; 152():106006. PubMed ID: 33556655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Review on big data applications in safety research of intelligent transportation systems and connected/automated vehicles.
    Lian Y, Zhang G, Lee J, Huang H.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct 23; 146():105711. PubMed ID: 32896748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.