These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 37012623

  • 1. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Pielage H, Plain BJ, Saunders GH, Versfeld NJ, Lunner T, Kramer SE, Zekveld AA.
    Ear Hear; ; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance.
    Pielage H, Zekveld AA, Saunders GH, Versfeld NJ, Lunner T, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 42(6):1577-1589. PubMed ID: 33795615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Aug; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of hearing acuity on psychophysiological responses to effortful speech perception.
    Keur-Huizinga L, Huizinga NA, Zekveld AA, Versfeld NJ, van de Ven SRB, van Dijk WAJ, de Geus EJC, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109031. PubMed ID: 38761554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Wendt D, Naylor G, Wang Y, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, Naylor G, Zekveld AA, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Aug; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D, Koelewijn T, Książek P, Kramer SE, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The Influence of Hearing Loss on the Pupil Response to Degraded Speech.
    Zekveld AA, Pielage H, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Oct 04; 66(10):4083-4099. PubMed ID: 37699194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses.
    Micula A, Rönnberg J, Fiedler L, Wendt D, Jørgensen MC, Larsen DK, Ng EHN.
    Ear Hear; 2023 Oct 04; 42(6):1668-1679. PubMed ID: 33859121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
    Zekveld AA, Heslenfeld DJ, Johnsrude IS, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov 01; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Pupil Dilation Reflects Perceptual Priorities During a Receptive Speech Task.
    Mechtenberg H, Giorio C, Myers EB.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Nov 01; 45(2):425-440. PubMed ID: 37882091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise.
    Koelewijn T, van Haastrecht JAP, Kramer SE.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Nov 01; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task.
    Wang Y, Naylor G, Kramer SE, Zekveld AA, Wendt D, Ohlenforst B, Lunner T.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Nov 01; 39(3):573-582. PubMed ID: 29117062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Time-specific Components of Pupil Responses Reveal Alternations in Effort Allocation Caused by Memory Task Demands During Speech Identification in Noise.
    Książek P, Zekveld AA, Fiedler L, Kramer SE, Wendt D.
    Trends Hear; 2023 Nov 01; 27():23312165231153280. PubMed ID: 36938784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Systematic Comparison of Trial Exclusion Criteria for Pupillometry Data Analysis in Individuals With Single-Sided Deafness and Normal Hearing.
    Burg EA, Thakkar T, Fields T, Misurelli SM, Kuchinsky SE, Roche J, Lee DJ, Litovsky RY.
    Trends Hear; 2021 Nov 01; 25():23312165211013256. PubMed ID: 34024219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct 01; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
    Bianchi F, Wendt D, Wassard C, Maas P, Lunner T, Rosenbom T, Holmberg M.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Oct 01; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.