These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

497 related items for PubMed ID: 37018626

  • 41. High reliability of morphokinetic annotations among embryologists.
    Martínez M, Santaló J, Rodríguez A, Vassena R.
    Hum Reprod Open; 2018; 2018(3):hoy009. PubMed ID: 30895250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using a matched propensity score design.
    Haviland MJ, Murphy LA, Modest AM, Fox MP, Wise LA, Nillni YI, Sakkas D, Hacker MR.
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct 01; 35(10):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 32856053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Is a freeze-all policy the optimal solution to circumvent the effect of late follicular elevated progesterone? A multicentric matched-control retrospective study analysing cumulative live birth rate in 942 non-elective freeze-all cycles.
    Racca A, Vanni VS, Somigliana E, Reschini M, Viganò P, Santos-Ribeiro S, Drakopoulos P, Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Papaleo E, Candiani M, Blockeel C.
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Aug 18; 36(9):2463-2472. PubMed ID: 34223890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Effects of ovarian stimulation on embryo euploidy: an analysis of 12 874 oocytes and 3106 blastocysts in cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders.
    Ma C, Long X, Yan L, Zhu X, Chen L, Li R, Wang Y, Qiao J.
    Hum Reprod Open; 2024 Aug 18; 2024(4):hoae054. PubMed ID: 39399299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation.
    Cornelisse S, Zagers M, Kostova E, Fleischer K, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Sep 08; 9(9):CD005291. PubMed ID: 32898291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Development of an IVF prediction model for donor oocytes: a retrospective analysis of 10 877 embryo transfers.
    Fitzgerald O, Newman J, Rombauts L, Polyakov A, Chambers GM.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Oct 01; 39(10):2274-2286. PubMed ID: 39173599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Development of automated annotation software for human embryo morphokinetics.
    Feyeux M, Reignier A, Mocaer M, Lammers J, Meistermann D, Barrière P, Paul-Gilloteaux P, David L, Fréour T.
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Mar 27; 35(3):557-564. PubMed ID: 32163566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Individualised luteal phase support in artificially prepared frozen embryo transfer cycles based on serum progesterone levels: a prospective cohort study.
    Álvarez M, Gaggiotti-Marre S, Martínez F, Coll L, García S, González-Foruria I, Rodríguez I, Parriego M, Polyzos NP, Coroleu B.
    Hum Reprod; 2021 May 17; 36(6):1552-1560. PubMed ID: 33686413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.
    Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Vaiarelli A, Dusi L, Buffo L, Amendola MG, Colamaria S, Giuliani M, Bruno G, Stoppa M, Ubaldi FM.
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr 28; 35(4):785-795. PubMed ID: 32240287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Comparison of blastocyst euploidy rates following luteal versus follicular phase stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol: a prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles.
    Martinez F, Clua E, Roca M, Garcia S, Polyzos NP.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov 24; 37(12):2777-2786. PubMed ID: 36269092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. No major differences in perinatal and maternal outcomes between uninterrupted embryo culture in time-lapse system and conventional embryo culture.
    Ahlström A, Lundin K, Cimadomo D, Coticchio G, Selleskog U, Westlander G, Winerdal J, Stenfelt C, Callender S, Nyberg C, Åström M, Löfdahl K, Nolte L, Sundler M, Kitlinski M, Liljeqvist Soltic I, Bohlin T, Baumgart J, Lindgren KE, Gülen Yaldir F, Rienzi L, Lind AK, Bergh C.
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec 04; 38(12):2400-2411. PubMed ID: 37879843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Preimplantation genetic testing is not a preferred recommendation for patients with X chromosome abnormalities.
    Li C, Dang Y, Li J, Li H, Zhu Y, Qin Y.
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Aug 18; 36(9):2612-2621. PubMed ID: 34323971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Association between the length of in vitro embryo culture, mode of ART, and the initial endogenous hCG rise in ongoing singleton pregnancies.
    Brockmeier C, Borgstrøm MB, Madsen K, Pinborg A, Freiesleben NL, Zedeler A, Petersen MR, Grøndahl ML, Svendsen PF.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 May 11. PubMed ID: 38734928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Is there an optimal window of time for transferring single frozen-thawed euploid blastocysts? A cohort study of 1170 embryo transfers.
    An BGL, Chapman M, Tilia L, Venetis C.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov 24; 37(12):2797-2807. PubMed ID: 36305795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by microarray analysis of polar bodies in advanced maternal age: a randomized clinical trial.
    Verpoest W, Staessen C, Bossuyt PM, Goossens V, Altarescu G, Bonduelle M, Devesa M, Eldar-Geva T, Gianaroli L, Griesinger G, Kakourou G, Kokkali G, Liebenthron J, Magli MC, Parriego M, Schmutzler AG, Tobler M, van der Ven K, Geraedts J, Sermon K.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep 01; 33(9):1767-1776. PubMed ID: 30085138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of  implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection.
    Basile N, Vime P, Florensa M, Aparicio Ruiz B, García Velasco JA, Remohí J, Meseguer M.
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb 01; 30(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 25527613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation.
    Aparicio-Ruiz B, Basile N, Pérez Albalá S, Bronet F, Remohí J, Meseguer M.
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov 01; 106(6):1379-1385.e10. PubMed ID: 27530063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.