These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
148 related items for PubMed ID: 37023635
1. Computation of group-level electric field in lower limb motor area for different tDCS montages. Hamajima H, Gomez-Tames J, Uehara S, Otaka Y, Tanaka S, Hirata A. Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Jun; 150():69-78. PubMed ID: 37023635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost of focality in TDCS: Interindividual variability in electric fields. Mikkonen M, Laakso I, Tanaka S, Hirata A. Brain Stimul; 2020 Jun; 13(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31606449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: A computer simulation study. Laakso I, Tanaka S, Mikkonen M, Koyama S, Sadato N, Hirata A. Neuroimage; 2016 Aug 15; 137():140-151. PubMed ID: 27188218 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. High-resolution head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: A labeling analysis. Thomas C, Huang Y, Faria PC, Datta A. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul 15; 2019():6442-6445. PubMed ID: 31947317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The electric field distributions in anatomical head models during transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation. Manoli Z, Parazzini M, Ravazzani P, Samaras T. Med Phys; 2017 Jan 15; 44(1):262-271. PubMed ID: 28044315 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). Alam M, Truong DQ, Khadka N, Bikson M. Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun 21; 61(12):4506-21. PubMed ID: 27223853 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Leg Motor Area - is it partly somatosensory? Rezaee Z, Dutta A. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul 21; 2018():4764-4767. PubMed ID: 30441414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Interindividual differences in posterior fossa morphometry affect cerebellar tDCS-induced electric field strength. Maas RPPWM, Faber J, ESMI MR Study Group, van de Warrenburg BPC, Schutter DJLG. Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Sep 21; 153():152-165. PubMed ID: 37499446 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-individual variability in current direction for common tDCS montages. Evans C, Zich C, Lee JSA, Ward N, Bestmann S. Neuroimage; 2022 Oct 15; 260():119501. PubMed ID: 35878726 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Addressing the sources of inter-subject variability in E-field parameters in anodal tDCS stimulation over motor cortical network. Franco-Rosado P, Callejón MA, Reina-Tosina J, Roa LM, Martin-Rodriguez JF, Mir P. Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jul 11; 69(14):. PubMed ID: 38917834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimized APPS-tDCS electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target stimulation magnitude in 3000 electric field models. Caulfield KA, George MS. Sci Rep; 2022 Nov 22; 12(1):20116. PubMed ID: 36418438 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]