These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 37052646

  • 1. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy or uterine preservation.
    Sato H, Otsuka S, Abe H, Tsukada S.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Sep; 34(9):2217-2224. PubMed ID: 37052646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Do we need to perform systematic supracervical hysterectomy during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy?].
    Saliba E, Nisolle M, Tchente C, De Landsheere L.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Sep; 47(7-8):549-554. PubMed ID: 31003018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prolapse and mesh reoperations following sacrocolpopexy: comparing supracervical hysterectomy, total hysterectomy, and no hysterectomy.
    Kikuchi JY, Yanek LR, Handa VL, Chen CCG, Jacobs S, Blomquist J, Patterson D.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):135-145. PubMed ID: 35689689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Risk of postoperative mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy with supracervical versus total concomitant laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Glass Clark S, Bretschneider CE, Bradley MS, Rhodes S, Shoag J, Sheyn D.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jan; 35(1):207-213. PubMed ID: 38060029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Assessing the Impact of Vaginal Hysterectomy with Vaginal Mesh Attachment on Outcomes and Complications during Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Woodburn KL, Bradley SE, Ward SA, Schirm KA, Clarke B, Gutman RE, Sokol AI.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 36223863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
    Chan JCY, Yu CH, Go WW.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, Kim-Fine S, Balk EM, Murphy M, Grimes CL, Sleemi A, Singh R, Dieter AA, Crisp CC, Rahn DD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Yan L, Lu S, Zhao C, Lei L, Liu L.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36563872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E, Boulus S, Lauterbach R, Amit A, Weiner Z, Lowenstein L.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O, Stewart JR, Meriwether KV, Francis SL, Gupta A.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Pan K, Cao L, Ryan NA, Wang Y, Xu H.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy plus supracervical hysterectomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
    Campagna G, Vacca L, Panico G, Rumolo V, Caramazza D, Lombisani A, Rossitto C, Gadonneix P, Scambia G, Ercoli A.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):359-368. PubMed ID: 34132865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Laparoscopic excision and re-attachment of sacrocolpopexy mesh.
    Malekzadeh M, Ramirez-Caban L, Hurtado E.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Dec; 32(12):3301-3303. PubMed ID: 34003310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison between laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy and hysteropexy in advanced urogenital prolapse.
    Illiano E, Giannitsas K, Costantini E.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2069-2074. PubMed ID: 32140751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A review on the role of laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy.
    Rosati M, Bramante S, Conti F.
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 26(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 24950123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Importance of vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy - retrospective study.
    Marinič Veverková A, Kališ V, Smažinka M, Havíř M, Rušavý Z.
    Ceska Gynekol; 2024 Aug; 89(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 38418247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure.
    Prendergast E, Silver H, Johnson LL, Simon M, Feinglass J, Kielb S, Hairston J, Lewicky-Gaupp C.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016 Aug; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Isenlik BS, Aksoy O, Erol O, Mulayim B.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):231-238. PubMed ID: 35737006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Rate of Mesh Erosion After Sacrocolpopexy With Concurrent Supracervical Compared With Total Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nassif J, Yadav GS, Orejuela FJ, Turrentine MA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep 01; 140(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 35926201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A, Hernandez-Aranda D, Wakefield DB, Shepherd JP.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb 01; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.