These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

187 related items for PubMed ID: 37054887

  • 1. Validation of the smartphone-based dietary assessment tool "Traqq" for assessing actual dietary intake by repeated 2-h recalls in adults: comparison with 24-h recalls and urinary biomarkers.
    Lucassen DA, Brouwer-Brolsma EM, Boshuizen HC, Mars M, de Vogel-Van den Bosch J, Feskens EJ.
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2023 Jun; 117(6):1278-1287. PubMed ID: 37054887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire as a tool for assessing dietary intake in cardiovascular disease research and surveillance in Bangladesh.
    Mumu SJ, Merom D, Ali L, Fahey PP, Hossain I, Rahman AKMF, Allman-Farinelli M.
    Nutr J; 2020 May 14; 19(1):42. PubMed ID: 32410632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews.
    Wark PA, Hardie LJ, Frost GS, Alwan NA, Carter M, Elliott P, Ford HE, Hancock N, Morris MA, Mulla UZ, Noorwali EA, Petropoulou K, Murphy D, Potter GDM, Riboli E, Greenwood DC, Cade JE.
    BMC Med; 2018 Aug 09; 16(1):136. PubMed ID: 30089491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Performance and Feasibility of Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool in Relation to Other Self-Report Tools and Biomarkers in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study.
    Subar AF, Potischman N, Dodd KW, Thompson FE, Baer DJ, Schoeller DA, Midthune D, Kipnis V, Kirkpatrick SI, Mittl B, Zimmerman TP, Douglass D, Bowles HR, Park Y.
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Nov 09; 120(11):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 32819883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A Preliminary Study on a Form of the 24-h Recall That Balances Survey Cost and Accuracy, Based on the NCI Method.
    Huang K, Zhao L, Fang H, Yu D, Yang Y, Li Z, Mu D, Ju L, Li S, Cheng X, Xu X, Guo Q.
    Nutrients; 2022 Jun 30; 14(13):. PubMed ID: 35807917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Validation of the web-based self-administered 24-h dietary recall myfood24-Germany: comparison with a weighed dietary record and biomarkers.
    Koch SAJ, Conrad J, Cade JE, Weinhold L, Alexy U, Nöthlings U.
    Eur J Nutr; 2021 Oct 30; 60(7):4069-4082. PubMed ID: 33974128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of Energy and Macronutrients Between a Mobile Application and a Conventional Dietary Assessment Method in Korea.
    Kim J, Kim H, Lee J, Ko H, Jung SY, Kim HJ, Wie GA, Kim Y.
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2022 Nov 30; 122(11):2127-2133.e4. PubMed ID: 35430416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biomarkers of Dietary Intake Are Correlated with Corresponding Measures from Repeated Dietary Recalls and Food-Frequency Questionnaires in the Adventist Health Study-2.
    Fraser GE, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Henning SM, Fan J, Knutsen SF, Haddad EH, Sabaté J, Beeson WL, Bennett H.
    J Nutr; 2016 Mar 30; 146(3):586-94. PubMed ID: 26843587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. DIetary ASSessment (DIASS) Study: Design of an Evaluation Study to Assess Validity, Usability and Perceived Burden of an Innovative Dietary Assessment Methodology.
    Lucassen DA, Brouwer-Brolsma EM, Slotegraaf AI, Kok E, Feskens EJM.
    Nutrients; 2022 Mar 09; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 35334813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of self-reported dietary intakes from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall, 4-d food records, and food-frequency questionnaires against recovery biomarkers.
    Park Y, Dodd KW, Kipnis V, Thompson FE, Potischman N, Schoeller DA, Baer DJ, Midthune D, Troiano RP, Bowles H, Subar AF.
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2018 Jan 01; 107(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 29381789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods.
    Kroke A, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Voss S, Möseneder J, Thielecke F, Noack R, Boeing H.
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1999 Oct 01; 70(4):439-47. PubMed ID: 10500011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Relative validity of habitual sugar and low/no-calorie sweetener consumption assessed by food frequency questionnaire, multiple 24-h dietary recalls and urinary biomarkers: an observational study within the SWEET project.
    Buso ME, Boshuizen HC, Naomi ND, Maho W, Diepeveen-de Bruin M, Balvers MG, de Vries JH, Harrold JA, Halford JC, Raben A, Feskens EJ, Brouwer-Brolsma EM.
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2024 Feb 01; 119(2):546-559. PubMed ID: 38043866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Using biochemical markers to assess the validity of prospective dietary assessment methods and the effect of energy adjustment.
    Bingham SA, Day NE.
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Apr 01; 65(4 Suppl):1130S-1137S. PubMed ID: 9094909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dietary evaluation and attenuation of relative risk: multiple comparisons between blood and urinary biomarkers, food frequency, and 24-hour recall questionnaires: the DEARR study.
    Shai I, Rosner BA, Shahar DR, Vardi H, Azrad AB, Kanfi A, Schwarzfuchs D, Fraser D, DEARR study.
    J Nutr; 2005 Mar 01; 135(3):573-9. PubMed ID: 15735096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of energy and nutrient intake estimation versus observed intake using 4 technology-assisted dietary assessment methods: a randomized crossover feeding study.
    Whitton C, Collins CE, Mullan BA, Rollo ME, Dhaliwal SS, Norman R, Boushey CJ, Delp EJ, Zhu F, McCaffrey TA, Kirkpatrick SI, Pollard CM, Healy JD, Hassan A, Garg S, Atyeo P, Mukhtar SA, Kerr DA.
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2024 Jul 01; 120(1):196-210. PubMed ID: 38710447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.