These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
256 related items for PubMed ID: 37073100
41. Biomechanical assessment of unilateral pedicle screws plus contralateral transfacetopedicular screws after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with two cages. Xue ZL, Chen ZX, Fu CH, Lei HJ, Yuan XW. Orthop Surg; 2013 Nov; 5(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 24254451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Biomechanical Stability Afforded by Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with and without Interbody Support Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Godzik J, Martinez-Del-Campo E, Newcomb AGUS, Reis MT, Perez-Orribo L, Whiting AC, Singh V, Kelly BP, Crawford NR. World Neurosurg; 2018 May; 113():e439-e445. PubMed ID: 29462730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Stand Alone Versus Facet Screw and Pedicle Screw Augmented Lateral Interbody Arthrodesis: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model. Kretzer RM, Molina C, Hu N, Umekoji H, Baaj AA, Serhan H, Cunningham BW. Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug 26; 29(7):E336-43. PubMed ID: 27137151 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Biomechanical evaluation of the hybrid pedicle screw-cortical bone trajectory technique in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion to adjacent segment degeneration-finite element analysis. Zhang R, Kahaer A, Niu H, Wang J, Jumahan A, Qiu Y, Rexiti P, Guo H. BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 May 23; 24(1):409. PubMed ID: 37221546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Biomechanical Evaluation of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Various Fixation Options for Adjacent Segment Degeneration: A Finite Element Analysis. Lee HJ, Lee SJ, Jung JM, Lee TH, Jeong C, Lee TJ, Jang JE, Lee JW. World Neurosurg; 2023 May 23; 173():e156-e167. PubMed ID: 36775239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Do expandable cage size and number of cages matter in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1? A comparative biomechanical analysis using finite element modeling. Bakhaidar M, Harinathan B, Banurekha Devaraj K, Yoganandan N, Shabani S. J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Aug 01; 41(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 38788233 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico study. Yang ZQ, Cai P, Li JC, Wang XD, Xie TH, Pu XX, Lin R, Zeng JC, Song YM. BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Dec 12; 23(1):1083. PubMed ID: 36503614 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The biomechanical study of a modified lumbar interbody fusion-crenel lateral interbody fusion (CLIF): a three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Chen YL, Lai OJ, Wang Y, Ma WH, Chen QX. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jul 12; 23(9):548-555. PubMed ID: 32223326 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous fusion device and bilateral pedicle screw system as additional fixation for lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Doulgeris JJ, Aghayev K, Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Lee WE, Vrionis FD. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2015 Feb 12; 30(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 25577548 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]