These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


133 related items for PubMed ID: 3708486

  • 1. Indications for cesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    CMAJ; 1986 Jun 15; 134(12):1348-52. PubMed ID: 3708486
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR, Burrows RF.
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr 15; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development statement on cesarean childbirth. A summary.
    J Reprod Med; 1981 Mar 15; 26(3):103-12. PubMed ID: 7230144
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cesarean childbirth: an NIH consensus development conference.
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1981 Sep 15; 20(9):555-60. PubMed ID: 7261531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: patients, facilities or policies?
    Anderson GM, Lomas J.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1985 Feb 01; 132(3):253-6, 259. PubMed ID: 3967160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. NIH Consensus Development Conference summary--Cesarean childbirth.
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1981 Oct 01; 74(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 7311515
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Summary of consensus development conference--childbirth by cesarean delivery.
    Rosen MG.
    J La State Med Soc; 1982 Oct 01; 134(3):94, 98. PubMed ID: 7119547
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cesarean section: trends and morbidity.
    Baskett TF, McMillen RM.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Oct 01; 125(7):723-6. PubMed ID: 7326654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN, Saywell RM, Zollinger TW, Erner BK, Oser TL.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct 01; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth.
    Md State Med J; 1982 Feb 01; 31(2):46-54. PubMed ID: 7070126
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cesarean section in the primigravid.
    Mesleh RA, Asiri F, Al-Naim MF.
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct 01; 21(10):957-9. PubMed ID: 11369962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
    Linton A, Peterson MR.
    Birth; 2004 Dec 01; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cesarean birth: the politics of consensus development.
    Summey PS, Hurst M.
    Health PAC Bull; 1981 Dec 01; 12(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 10252337
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Term breech presentation: an indication for cesarean section].
    van Roosmalen J, Scherjon SA.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Oct 27; 145(43):2102-3; author reply 2103-4. PubMed ID: 11715602
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J, van der Does CD.
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995 Oct 27; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cesarean section: changing incidence and indications.
    Gilstrap LC, Hauth JC, Toussaint S.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb 27; 63(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 6694814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cesarean childbirth.
    Consens Dev Conf Summ Natl Inst Health; 1980 Feb 27; 3():39-53. PubMed ID: 7023816
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Term breech position; an indication for cesarean section].
    Verhoeven AT.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Jan 12; 146(2):86-7. PubMed ID: 11820063
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cesarean section rates in the United States. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980.
    Gleicher N.
    JAMA; 1984 Dec 21; 252(23):3273-6. PubMed ID: 6512931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Elective repeat cesarean sections: how many could be vaginal births?
    Norman P, Kostovcik S, Lanning A.
    CMAJ; 1993 Aug 15; 149(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 8348425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.