These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
129 related items for PubMed ID: 37137798
1. Sex-Specific Differences in Aortic Valve Calcification Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Severe Aortic Stenosis. Veulemans V, Hokken TW, Heermann J, Kardys I, Maier O, Adrichem R, Ooms J, Nuis RJ, Daemen J, Hirsch A, Budde RP, Zeus T, Van Mieghem NM. Am J Cardiol; 2023 Jun 15; 197():87-92. PubMed ID: 37137798 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology. Ye Z, Clavel MA, Foley TA, Pibarot P, Enriquez-Sarano M, Michelena HI. Heart; 2024 Mar 22; 110(8):594-602. PubMed ID: 37903555 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of age and aortic valve anatomy on calcification and haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis. Shen M, Tastet L, Capoulade R, Larose É, Bédard É, Arsenault M, Chetaille P, Dumesnil JG, Mathieu P, Clavel MA, Pibarot P. Heart; 2017 Jan 01; 103(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 27504001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and efficacy of minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a new-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves. Michel JM, Frangieh AH, Giacoppo D, Alvarez-Covarrubias HA, Pellegrini C, Rheude T, Deutsch O, Mayr NP, Rumpf PM, Stähli BE, Kastrati A, Schunkert H, Xhepa E, Joner M, Kasel AM. Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Dec 01; 110(12):1993-2006. PubMed ID: 34505192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Contemporary differences between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve in chronic aortic regurgitation. Yang LT, Benfari G, Eleid M, Scott CG, Nkomo VT, Pellikka PA, Anavekar NS, Enriquez-Sarano M, Michelena HI. Heart; 2021 Jun 01; 107(11):916-924. PubMed ID: 33109713 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Multichamber Strain Characterization Is a Robust Prognosticator for Both Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis. Ye Z, Yang LT, Medina-Inojosa JR, Scott CG, Padang R, Luis SA, Nkomo VT, Enriquez-Sarano M, Michelena HI. J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2022 Sep 01; 35(9):956-965. PubMed ID: 35613661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic Implications of Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valve Phenotype on Progression of Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Ascending Aorta Dilatation. Chew NWS, Phua K, Ho YJ, Zhang A, Lin N, Ngiam JN, Lau YX, Teo VXY, Sia CH, Loh PH, Kuntjoro I, Wong RCC, Lee CH, Tan HC, Yeo TC, Kong WKF, Poh KK. Am J Cardiol; 2021 Dec 15; 161():76-83. PubMed ID: 34627597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Aortic stiffness in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiovascular MRI: a comparison between bicuspid and tricuspid valves. Singh A, Horsfield MA, Bekele S, Greenwood JP, Dawson DK, Berry C, Hogrefe K, Kelly DJ, Houston JG, Guntur Ramkumar P, Uddin A, Suzuki T, McCann GP. Eur Radiol; 2019 May 15; 29(5):2340-2349. PubMed ID: 30488106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Persistence of Reduced Left Ventricular Function after Aortic Valve Surgery for Aortic Valve Regurgitation: Bicuspid versus Tricuspid. Petersen J, Neumann N, Naito S, Sequeira Gross T, Massel R, Reichenspurner H, Girdauskas E. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Aug 15; 69(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 31299697 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Aortic root, not valve, calcification correlates with coronary artery calcification in patients with severe aortic stenosis: A two-center study. Henein M, Hällgren P, Holmgren A, Sörensen K, Ibrahimi P, Kofoed KF, Larsen LH, Hassager C. Atherosclerosis; 2015 Dec 15; 243(2):631-7. PubMed ID: 26551591 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]