These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
112 related items for PubMed ID: 37146231
1. In Reply to Hancock and Mattick. Stephens GC, Wilson AB, Lazarus MD. Acad Med; 2023 Aug 01; 98(8):870-871. PubMed ID: 37146231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In Reply to Hancock and Mattick. Rising KL, McCarthy DM. Acad Med; 2021 Mar 01; 96(3):320. PubMed ID: 33661841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hemodynamic performance and clinical outcome of pericardial Perimount Magna and Porcine Hancock-II valves in aortic position. Caporali E, Bonato R, Klersy C, Ferrari E. J Card Surg; 2019 Oct 01; 34(10):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 31389647 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Hancock I and Hancock II bioprostheses. Oury JH, Angell WW, Koziol JA. J Card Surg; 1988 Sep 01; 3(3 Suppl):375-81. PubMed ID: 2980040 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of Hancock mitral valve by M-mode echocardiography. Clinical significance of the timing of closing and opening of the valve]. Futamata H, Matsushita S, Shimizu M, Kamio Y, Takizawa Y, Imura T, Matsubara F, Genda A, Tsuchiya K. J Cardiogr; 1983 Mar 01; 13(1):125-36. PubMed ID: 6644102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemodynamic evaluation of 23 mm Pericarbon and 23 mm Hancock II bioprostheses in the aortic position at mid-term follow up. Ius P, Totis O, Chirillo F, Cavarzerani A, Zussa C, Piccoli C, Valfrè C. J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov 01; 5(6):656-61. PubMed ID: 8953444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Echocardiographic and pathologic features of explanted Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position. Naqvi TZ, Siegel RJ, Buchbinder NA, Miroshnik S, Saedi G, Trento A, Fishbein MC. Am J Cardiol; 1999 Dec 15; 84(12):1422-7. PubMed ID: 10606116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of primary tissue failure between porcine (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) and bovine pericardial (Ionescu-Shiley) bioprostheses in the aortic position at five- to nine-year follow-up. Gallo I, Nistal F, Arbe E, Artiñano E. Am J Cardiol; 1988 Apr 01; 61(10):812-6. PubMed ID: 3354445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Follow-up study in 69 patients with a Hancock bioprosthesis]. den Hartog FR, Meurs AA, Zienkowicz BS. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1988 Jun 18; 132(25):1152-7. PubMed ID: 3398943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years. Milano AD, Bortolotti U, Mazzucco A, Guerra F, Magni A, Gallucci V. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul 18; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]