These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

370 related items for PubMed ID: 37189154

  • 1. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
    Vågenes H, Pranić SM.
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May 15; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G, Fang CH, Agarwal N, Bhagat N, Eloy JA, Langer PD.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr 15; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
    Edmunds MR, Barry RJ, Denniston AK.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec 15; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Patient-Directed Vasectomy Information: How Readable Is It?
    Kianian R, Hu MY, Lavold AJ, Andino JJ, Morrison JC, Eleswarapu SV, Mills JN.
    World J Mens Health; 2024 Apr 15; 42(2):408-414. PubMed ID: 37853530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Transoral robotic surgery: Differences between online information and academic literature.
    Shetty KR, Wong K, Hashemi S, Shetty A, Levi JR.
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2020 Apr 15; 41(4):102395. PubMed ID: 32008838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Assessing the quality and readability of online content on shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction.
    Reddy RV, Golan R, Loloi J, Diaz P, Saltzman RG, Watane A, Ramasamy R.
    Andrologia; 2022 Dec 15; 54(11):e14607. PubMed ID: 36240784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI, Mingin GC, Baskin LS.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb 15; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Carpal Tunnel Surgery: Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Educational Resources?
    Gao B, Skalitzky MK, Rund J, Shamrock AG, Gulbrandsen TR, Buckwalter J.
    Iowa Orthop J; 2024 Feb 15; 44(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 38919356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clear as Mud: Readability Scores in Cloacal Exstrophy Literature and Its Treatment.
    Haffar A, Hirsch A, Morrill C, Garcia A, Werner Z, Gearhart JP, Crigger C.
    Res Rep Urol; 2024 Feb 15; 16():39-44. PubMed ID: 38370509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Is the Internet a Suitable Patient Resource for Information on Common Radiological Investigations?: Radiology-Related Information on the Internet.
    Bowden DJ, Yap LC, Sheppard DG.
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul 15; 24(7):826-830. PubMed ID: 28216191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
    Shah R, Mahajan J, Oydanich M, Khouri AS.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023 Jul 15; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.