These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 37221091

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Using attitudinal indicators to explain the public's intention to have recourse to gamete donation and surrogacy.
    Chliaoutakis JE, Koukouli S, Papadakaki M.
    Hum Reprod; 2002 Nov; 17(11):2995-3002. PubMed ID: 12407063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.
    Svanberg AS, Sydsjö G, Bladh M, Lampic C.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 27059774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Online sperm donation: a survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website.
    Freeman T, Jadva V, Tranfield E, Golombok S.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2082-9. PubMed ID: 27412344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Mississippi's whole body donors: Analysis of donor pool demographics and their rationale for donation.
    Mueller CM, Allison SM, Conway ML.
    Ann Anat; 2021 Mar; 234():151673. PubMed ID: 33400980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
    Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, Abdalla H, Thum MY.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Dual consent? Donors' and recipients' views about involvement in decision-making on the use of embryos created by gamete donation in research.
    Baía I, de Freitas C, Samorinha C, Provoost V, Silva S.
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Dec 02; 20(1):90. PubMed ID: 31791312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Views of donors and recipients regarding disclosure to children following altruistic known oocyte donation.
    Yee S, Blyth E, Tsang AK.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Dec 02; 23(7):851-9. PubMed ID: 22019613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.
    Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjö G.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep 02; 29(9):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25030191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Perceptions of the gift relationship in organ and tissue donation: Views of intensivists and donor and recipient coordinators.
    Shaw R.
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Feb 02; 70(4):609-15. PubMed ID: 19931963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Should sperm donors be paid? A survey of the attitudes of the general public.
    Lyall H, Gould GW, Cameron IT.
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Mar 02; 13(3):771-5. PubMed ID: 9572451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Multiple meanings of "gift" and its value for organ donation.
    Shaw RM, Webb R.
    Qual Health Res; 2015 May 02; 25(5):600-11. PubMed ID: 25274624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.