These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

177 related items for PubMed ID: 3722436

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Audiometric Testing With Pulsed, Steady, and Warble Tones in Listeners With Tinnitus and Hearing Loss.
    Lentz JJ, Walker MA, Short CE, Skinner KG.
    Am J Audiol; 2017 Sep 18; 26(3):328-337. PubMed ID: 28892822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An evaluation of high-frequency audiometry suitable for routine clinical use.
    Rendell RJ, Miller JJ.
    Br J Audiol; 1983 May 18; 17(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 6626785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.
    Bornman M, Swanepoel W, De Jager LB, Eikelboom RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar 18; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M, Watkin P.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Mar 18; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Continuous versus pulsed pure-tone audiometry in a group of school-aged children.
    van Dijk C, Osman N.
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2008 Mar 18; 55():29-36. PubMed ID: 19485067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The influence of audiometric configuration on pure-tone, warble-tone and narrow-band noise thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing losses.
    Stephens MM, Rintelmann WF.
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978 Mar 18; 3(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 659294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of warble-tone frequency deviation on threshold measurement in cases with sloping audiometric configurations.
    Lundeen C.
    J Aud Res; 1987 Jan 18; 27(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 3448067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
    Rieke CC, Clavier OH, Allen LV, Anderson AP, Brooks CA, Fellows AM, Brungart DS, Buckey JC.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Jan 18; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Audiometric zero for air conduction using manual audiometry.
    Fearn RW, Hanson DR.
    Br J Audiol; 1983 May 18; 17(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 6626786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Air conduction thresholds and secretory otitis media: a conventional and extra-high frequency audiometric comparison.
    Mair IW, Fjermedal O, Laukli E.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Oct 18; 98(10):767-71. PubMed ID: 2802458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Functional hearing loss and its relationship to resolved hearing levels.
    Gelfand SA, Silman S.
    Ear Hear; 1985 Oct 18; 6(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 4007300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.