These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

81 related items for PubMed ID: 3726193

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of the effects of ionic vs non-ionic contrast media on the venous endothelium. Scanning electron microscopic observations.
    Morettin LB.
    Radiol Med; 1986 Jun; 72(6 Suppl 1):22-4. PubMed ID: 3726193
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Iopamidol a new contrast agent in angiocardiography. Experimental and clinical experience in comparison with a commonly used contrast medium.
    Niccoli L, Bellandi M, Benedini G, Cucchini F, Ettori F, Leonzi O, Visioli O.
    Radiol Med; 1986 Jun; 72(6 Suppl 1):32-6. PubMed ID: 3726197
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Nephrotoxicity of contrast media assessed by occlusion arteriography.
    Lund G, Rysavy J, Salomonowitz E, Cragg A, Vlodaver Z, Bendell W, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Amplatz K.
    Radiology; 1984 Sep; 152(3):615-9. PubMed ID: 6463242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effect of contrast media on the aortic endothelium of rats.
    Gospos C, Freudenberg N, Staubesand J, Mathias K, Papacharlampos X.
    Radiology; 1983 Jun; 147(3):685-8. PubMed ID: 6844605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Excretory urography--current indications of the status of a conventional diagnostic method. Status of nonionic and ionic contrast media].
    Porst H, Mayer R.
    Fortschr Med; 1985 Aug 15; 103(30):755-8. PubMed ID: 4043912
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Excretion of contrast media by the immature rabbit. Comparison of Renografin and Iopamidol.
    Rosenbaum DM, Caldicott WJ.
    Invest Radiol; 1984 Aug 15; 19(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6533102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Ionic and non-ionic contrast agent-mediated endothelial injury. Quantitative analysis of cell proliferation during endothelial repair.
    Gabelmann A, Haberstroh J, Weyrich G.
    Acta Radiol; 2001 Jul 15; 42(4):422-5. PubMed ID: 11442469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Advantages of non-ionic contrast media in vascular applications.
    Malott JC, Fodor J.
    Radiol Technol; 1984 Jul 15; 56(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 6390518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.