These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
151 related items for PubMed ID: 37272140
1. Conventional Rotary Technique and Piezosurgical Technique in the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Comparative Study. Hamza SP, Aslam S, Roshni A, Cherian MP, Soman S, Akhila K. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Feb 01; 24(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 37272140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Study of Piezoelectric and Rotary Osteotomy Technique for Third Molar Impaction. Basheer SA, Govind RJ, Daniel A, Sam G, Adarsh VJ, Rao A. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jan 01; 18(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 28050988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Jiang Q, Qiu Y, Yang C, Yang J, Chen M, Zhang Z. Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Oct 01; 94(41):e1685. PubMed ID: 26469902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective split-mouth clinical study: comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted third molar surgery. Menziletoglu D, Basturk F, Isik BK, Esen A. Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar 01; 24(1):51-55. PubMed ID: 31811604 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Postoperative evaluation of Er:YAG laser, piezosurgery, and rotary systems used for osteotomy in mandibular third-molar extractions. Civak T, Ustun T, Yilmaz HN, Gursoy B. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Jan 01; 49(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 33298388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth clinical study. Gulnahar Y, Alpan AL. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2021 May 01; 26(3):e269-e275. PubMed ID: 33772570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Piezo-surgery technique and intramuscular dexamethasone injection to reduce postoperative pain after impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Nehme W, Fares Y, Abou-Abbas L. BMC Oral Health; 2021 Aug 11; 21(1):393. PubMed ID: 34380473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative analysis of postoperative morbidity and alveolar bone regeneration following surgical extraction of ımpacted lower third molar teeth using piezosurgery and conventional ınstruments: a split-mouth clinical ınvestigation. Erdem MK, Cambazoglu M. Eur J Med Res; 2024 Sep 14; 29(1):460. PubMed ID: 39272144 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of surgical outcome after removal of impacted mandibular third molars using a Piezotome or a conventional handpiece: a prospective study. Goyal M, Marya K, Jhamb A, Chawla S, Sonoo PR, Singh V, Aggarwal A. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep 14; 50(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 22088359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Osteotomy: A Comparison of Techniques in the Extraction of Unerupted Mandibular Third Molars in Children. Yang L, Chen Y, Fang W. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun 14; 80(6):1078-1083. PubMed ID: 35300957 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of platelet-rich fibrin and piezosurgery on impacted mandibular third molar surgery outcomes. Uyanık LO, Bilginaylar K, Etikan İ. Head Face Med; 2015 Jul 26; 11():25. PubMed ID: 26209242 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Piezosurgery versus conventional rotary surgery for impacted third molars: A randomised, split-mouth, clinical pilot trial. Demirci A, Bayram F, Dergin G. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2024 Jan 01; 29(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 37992138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of the technique of piezoelectric corticotomy for orthodontic traction of impacted mandibular third molars. Ma Z, Xu G, Yang C, Xie Q, Shen Y, Zhang S. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr 01; 53(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 25638568 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the effects of platelet-rich fibrin and piezosurgery on outcomes after removal of ımpacted mandibular third molars. Bilginaylar K, Uyanik LO. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul 01; 54(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 27044941 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Piezosurgery or conventional rotatory instruments for inferior third molar extractions? Piersanti L, Dilorenzo M, Monaco G, Marchetti C. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep 01; 72(9):1647-52. PubMed ID: 25109581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified lingual split technique versus conventional buccal technique in odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars. Hindy AM, Ismaiel ME, Fayed N. Egypt Dent J; 1995 Apr 01; 41(2):1137-44. PubMed ID: 9497650 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone microRNA-21 as surgical stress parameter is associated with third molar postoperative discomfort. Vucetic M, Roganovic J, Freilich M, Shafer D, Milic M, DJukic L, Petrovic N, Markovic E, Markovic A, Brkovic B. Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jan 01; 25(1):319-328. PubMed ID: 32495225 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Piezoelectric Surgery Is Effective in Reducing Pain, Swelling, and Trismus After Removal of Impacted Lower Third Molars: A Meta-Analysis. Nogueira DGM, Leão JC, Sales PHDH, Silva PGB, Gomes ACA. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Apr 01; 81(4):483-498. PubMed ID: 36442532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of hyaluronic acid spray on swelling, pain, and trismus after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Koray M, Ofluoglu D, Onal EA, Ozgul M, Ersev H, Yaltirik M, Tanyeri H. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Nov 01; 43(11):1399-403. PubMed ID: 24924267 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]