These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 37289946

  • 1. Comparison of effect of CTG + STan with CTG alone on emergency Cesarean section rate: STan Australian Randomized controlled Trial (START).
    Kuah S, Simpson B, Salter A, Matthews G, Louise J, Bednarz J, Chandraharan E, Symonds I, McPhee A, Mol BW, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):462-470. PubMed ID: 37289946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START).
    Turnbull D, Salter A, Simpson B, Mol BW, Chandraharan E, McPhee A, Symonds I, Benton M, Kuah S, Matthews G, Howard K, Wilkinson C.
    Trials; 2019 Aug 29; 20(1):539. PubMed ID: 31464638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Psychosocial outcomes from one cohort participating in the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START).
    Benton M, Salter A, Wilkinson C, Simpson B, Turnbull D.
    Birth; 2024 Sep 29; 51(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 38305668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cardiotocography combined with ST analysis versus cardiotocography combined with fetal blood sampling in deliveries with abnormal CTG: a randomized trial.
    Victor SF, Bach DBB, Hvelplund AC, Nickelsen C, Lyndrup J, Wilken-Jensen C, Scharff LJ, Weber T, Secher NJ, Krebs L.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Jun 29; 307(6):1771-1780. PubMed ID: 35701639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. ST waveform analysis vs cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Blix E, Brurberg KG, Reierth E, Reinar LM, Øian P.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Mar 29; 103(3):437-448. PubMed ID: 38093630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Potti S, Berghella V.
    Am J Perinatol; 2012 Sep 29; 29(8):657-64. PubMed ID: 22639349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The impact of the introduction of intrapartum fetal ECG ST segment analysis. A population study.
    Blix E, Eskild A, Skau I, Grytten J.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jul 29; 101(7):809-818. PubMed ID: 35288935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intrapartum monitoring with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis in breech presentation: an observational study.
    Kessler J, Moster D, Albrechtsen S.
    BJOG; 2015 Mar 29; 122(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 25040705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Al Wattar BH, Honess E, Bunnewell S, Welton NJ, Quenby S, Khan KS, Zamora J, Thangaratinam S.
    CMAJ; 2021 Apr 06; 193(14):E468-E477. PubMed ID: 33824144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A qualitative study of a sample of women participating in an Australian randomised controlled trial of intrapartum fetal surveillance.
    Benton M, Salter A, Simpson B, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D.
    Midwifery; 2020 Apr 06; 83():102655. PubMed ID: 32036193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Women's satisfaction with intrapartum fetal surveillance: A mixed-method study within the STan Australian randomised controlled trial (START).
    Benton M, Salter A, Wilkinson C, Simpson B, Turnbull D.
    Midwifery; 2024 Sep 27; 140():104193. PubMed ID: 39423769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial.
    Amer-Wåhlin I, Hellsten C, Norén H, Hagberg H, Herbst A, Kjellmer I, Lilja H, Lindoff C, Månsson M, Mårtensson L, Olofsson P, Sundström A, Marsál K.
    Lancet; 2001 Aug 18; 358(9281):534-8. PubMed ID: 11520523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to cardiotocography to predict fetal acidosis in labor--a multi-center, case controlled study.
    Norén H, Luttkus AK, Stupin JH, Blad S, Arulkumaran S, Erkkola R, Luzietti R, Visser GH, Yli B, Rosén KG.
    J Perinat Med; 2007 Aug 18; 35(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 17685855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Routine use of ST-segment of fetal electrocardiogram for monitoring labor. A year's experience (preliminary results)].
    Haberstich R, Vayssière C, David E, Sebahoun V, Schmitt B, Langer B, Nisand I.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Oct 18; 31(10):820-6. PubMed ID: 14642938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.